Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types-09

2019-08-21 Thread Alissa Cooper
Linda, thanks for your review. Igor, thanks for your response. I’ve entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On May 15, 2019, at 4:51 PM, Linda Dunbar wrote: > > Igor, > > Thank you very much for the reply. > Are you saying that all the "common TE types" in this document have been >

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types-09

2019-05-15 Thread Linda Dunbar
Igor, Thank you very much for the reply. Are you saying that all the "common TE types" in this document have been validated? If yes, then it is good. Thank you. Just as a Gen-Art Directorate reviewer, I did my due-diligence to check the common types defined in your draft are actually from

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types-09

2019-05-15 Thread Igor Bryskin
Hi Linda, Thank you for your comments. Please, note that it was never a goal of this work to produce some sort of Oxford English Dictionary for Traffic Engineering with providing references illustrating basic and subtle usages of each ID of each defined TE related definition (as OED does).