Hi Tom,
please wait until the telechat is over on Thurdsday. It starts at 11:30 ET und
runs for approx 2hrs.
Thanks!
Martin
On 02.12.2014, at 02:28, Tom Haynes thomas.hay...@primarydata.com wrote:
Hi Elwyn,
Not sure if I’m allowed to post a new copy. Martin?
This has all of the
Hi, Ben,
Thanks so much for your feedback! Please find my comments in-line...
On 12/01/2014 08:58 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
Document: draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield-04 Reviewer: Ben Campbell
Review Date: 2014-12-01 IETF LC End Date: 2014-12-01
Summary: This draft is almost ready for
Hi.
Sorry to keep harping on about READDIR, but...
Tom's comment about opendir/closedir at the end of the mail nbelow
obviously triggered something in my brain overnight, 'cos I woke up
realizing that I wasn't correctly understanding the semantics here.
Please bear with while I parade my
Hence, NFS has no equivalent of the directory stream referred to in the
Unix manual pages. Furthermore you don't 'open' a directory in NFSv4, you
just give it the filehandle.
Correct. NFSv4 just took over the NFSv3 approach to reading directories
and NFSv3 doesn't support open/close at all.
On Dec 2, 2014, at 6:00 AM, Elwyn Davies elw...@dial.pipex.com wrote:
Hi.
Sorry to keep harping on about READDIR, but...
Tom's comment about opendir/closedir at the end of the mail nbelow obviously
triggered something in my brain overnight, 'cos I woke up realizing that I
wasn't
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Document:
Hi, David.
Excellent. I think some suitable combination of your words below would
fill the bill.
The point about the very large directories is well taken - I hadn't
grokked that previously.
I guess the update should go in s15.26.5 after para 1:
Something like:
-
As
Hi, Robert, and thanks so much for the re-review.
First: (For Barry as sponsoring AD and shepherd):
I think you might want to say more about how this and the related PWG
documents are being handled cross-organization.
An RFC that normatively updates a document under some other
On 12/2/14 11:00 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
Hi, Robert, and thanks so much for the re-review.
First: (For Barry as sponsoring AD and shepherd):
I think you might want to say more about how this and the related PWG
documents are being handled cross-organization.
An RFC that normatively updates a
When you suggest saying more, are you suggesting saying more in the
document?
I mostly meant the writeup - I expect there will be IESG folks with the same
questions I had.
I can do that, sure.
This document updates:
...
c) IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP Version 2.0 Second Edition
cookies previously given out. When such a situation occurs, the server
should modify the cookie verifier so as to
accept cookies which would otherwise no longer be vali
''accept cookies' -- disallow use of cookies'
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Elwyn Davies elw...@dial.pipex.com wrote:
Hi Elwyn,
Thanks for all of the review and help effort. Besides the inexplicable typos,
you unearthed some issues which would give an experienced reader pause.
Tom
On Dec 2, 2014, at 8:41 AM, Elwyn Davies elw...@dial.pipex.com wrote:
Hi, David.
Excellent. I think some suitable
On Dec 2, 2014, at 12:20 PM, Barry Leiba barryle...@computer.org wrote:
When you suggest saying more, are you suggesting saying more in the
document?
I mostly meant the writeup - I expect there will be IESG folks with the same
questions I had.
I can do that, sure.
This document
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Document:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Document:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Document:
On 12/2/14 11:20 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
When you suggest saying more, are you suggesting saying more in the
document?
I mostly meant the writeup - I expect there will be IESG folks with the same
questions I had.
I can do that, sure.
This document updates:
...
Hi Pete and Robert,
My mistake - agreed - (c) should go - and no need for the note about PWG
IPP/2.0.
(which will get updated anyway to reference the IETF IPPS spec next year).
Cheers,
- Ira (wearing PWG IPP co-chair and IPP/2.0 co-editor hats)
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
18 matches
Mail list logo
