Thanks for the review, Jouni!
I see that the newer versions have corrected at least some of the issues
discussed here; didn’t check all but it seems fine enough now for me to ballot
no-objection. Which I have done.
Jari
On 19 Aug 2016, at 19:19, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
From: Meral Shirazipour [mailto:meral.shirazip...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 11:27 PM
To: draft-ietf-cose-msg@tools.ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org
Subject: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-cose-msg-18
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team
(Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF
Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before
posting a new version of the draft. For more information,
Hi Peter,
I am happy with your reply, so I'll wait for the updated version of the draft :)
Regards,
Christer
-Original Message-
From: peter van der Stok [mailto:stokc...@xs4all.nl]
Sent: 28 September 2016 13:34
To: Christer Holmberg
Cc:
Hi Christer,
Thanks for your suggestions and comments.
A bit late reaction due to holidays.
See my answers below. It is not excluded that my co-author may refine
(improve) my answers.
Peter
Christer Holmberg schreef op 2016-09-20 13:34:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team
(Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF
Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at