[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-key-tag-04

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at Document: draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-key-tag-04.txt Reviewer: Christer Holmberg Review Date:

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast-16

Thanks for your review(s) Francis! On 21 Jan 2017, at 14:22, Francis Dupont wrote: > Reviewer: Francis Dupont > Review result: Ready > > draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast-14 already reviewed for Last Call > and the few nits were addressed in newer versions. > >

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-mmusic-4572-update-11

Elwyn, Christer — many thanks for the in-depth review and updates. I have posted a “no objection” position for this document for tomorrow’s IESG telechat. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-04

> On Feb 1, 2017, at 4:36 PM, Jari Arkko wrote: > > Thanks for your review, Christer! > > Authors, can you make a note of the editorials? Yes, I have agreed to make all of the changes suggested by Christer. Thanks -- Kim > > Jari > > On 01 Feb

Re: [Gen-art] [Int-area] Review of draft-ietf-intarea-hostname-practice-04

Roni: Thanks for your review! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-04

Hi, INTRODUCTION: >> Q2:In the Introduction, before the first sentence, shouldn't >> there be some background text, including some information about the >> problem that the document solves. I know there is something in the >> Abstract, but I think there should also be something in the

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-elie-nntp-tls-recommendations-01

Thanks for your review, Jouni. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-04

Thanks for the review Christer. And thanks for taking care of this quickly Kim. Regards Suresh > On Feb 1, 2017, at 11:43 PM, kkinnear wrote: > > >> On Feb 1, 2017, at 4:36 PM, Jari Arkko wrote: >> >> Thanks for your review, Christer! >> >>

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-04

Christer, Thanks for your review. I will make all of the changes that you suggest, and have offered details (indented) below. Note that while I'm willing to make the change you have discussed in Q3, I don't actually understand what you would like us to do. More below... > On Feb 1, 2017, at

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-04

Hi, You suggestions look good, and I am happy with your reply :) Regards, Christer -Original Message- From: kkinnear [mailto:kkinn...@cisco.com] Sent: 02 February 2017 01:07 To: Christer Holmberg Cc: Kim Kinnear ; gen-art@ietf.org;

Re: [Gen-art] [Softwires] Review of draft-ietf-softwire-multicast-prefix-option-12

Thanks! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-12

Thanks for your review, Stewart. I set the my position to “No objection” for this document in the upcoming IESG telechat. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-04

Thanks for your review, Christer! Authors, can you make a note of the editorials? Jari On 01 Feb 2017, at 21:57, Christer Holmberg wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-kitten-krb-auth-indicator-04

Many thanks for the review, Robert. These reviews are much appreciated, and at least from my perspective, improve the quality of the RFCs. Happy to hear from Benjamin that he’s considering the editorial issues Robert found in this case. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-04

Christer, I have deleted the issues not under discussion. More comments, indented, below... > On Feb 1, 2017, at 5:57 PM, Christer Holmberg > wrote: > > Hi, > >> >>> Q3:In the Introduction, I suggest adding a reference to the first >>> occurrences

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-04

W dniu 01.02.2017 o 21:57, Christer Holmberg pisze: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by > the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like > any other last call comments. >

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-08

Thanks! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-payload-melpe-05

Thanks! On 27 Jan 2017, at 20:20, Brian Carpenter wrote: > Reviewer: Brian Carpenter > Review result: Ready > > Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-payload-melpe-05 > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART)

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-04

Hi, >I will make all of the changes that you suggest, and have offered details >(indented) below. Note that while I'm willing to make the change you have >discussed in Q3, I don't >actually understand what you would like us to do. > >More below... INTRODUCTION: >> Q1:In the first

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-harkins-owe-05

Thanks for your review, Lucy! Jari On 09 Dec 2016, at 18:17, Lucy Yong wrote: > Reviewer: Lucy Yong > Review result: Ready with Nits > > The draft is nearly ready for the publication. > > Minor comment: Suggest adding this in security considerations: OWE > provides

Re: [Gen-art] [DMM] Review of draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04

Hello Sri, The review was indeed super. I'll respond sometime in the next few days. Regards, Charlie P. On 2/1/2017 9:09 PM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) wrote: Thank you Dale for a great review. Charlie/Authors - Can you please respond to Dale and address these comments. Regards Sri On

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-length-hint-issue-05

Hi, I will leave only the items that needed my response 7. In section 3.4 “If the client decided to use the prefix provided by the server despite being longer than the prefix-length hint” yet I did not see in section 3.2 that the server can provide a longer prefix. [Tianxiang] This was

Re: [Gen-art] [DMM] Review of draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04

Thank you Dale for a great review. Charlie/Authors - Can you please respond to Dale and address these comments. Regards Sri On 1/31/17, 11:34 AM, "dmm on behalf of Dale Worley" wrote: >Reviewer: Dale Worley >Review result: Ready with

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-oauth-amr-values-05

Thanks, Jari. From my perspective, given that there are lots of registration procedures for existing RFCs that incorporate a public review period on a mailing list, I think it makes sense to explicitly call out this possibility in 5226bis. Best wishes,

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-teas-p2mp-loose-path-reopt-08

Thanks for your review, Dan. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-oauth-amr-values-05

Jari, On 2/1/17 2:57 PM, Jari Arkko wrote: Thanks for your review, Paul, and thanks for the discussion, Mike. I think there’s text in 5226bis about it being possible to ask people to post things to a mailing list. I just checked rfc5226bis. As best I can tell, it has not substantially

[Gen-art] Bounce test, please ignore

This is a test to see if a bounce problem has been resolved. Avri, if you get this via gen-art, but didn't get one from tianxiang li the problem has indeed been resolved. Brian ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-oauth-amr-values-05

Thanks for your review, Paul, and thanks for the discussion, Mike. I think there’s text in 5226bis about it being possible to ask people to post things to a mailing list. Jari On 26 Jan 2017, at 22:05, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > On 1/26/17 3:48 PM, Mike Jones wrote: >> The

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-04

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at