[Gen-art] 答复: Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext-08

Hi, Pete, Thanks for your review. Please find my considerations inline... Best wishes, Haomian -邮件原件- 发件人: Pete Resnick [mailto:presn...@qti.qualcomm.com] 发送时间: 2017年2月11日 7:24 收件人: gen-art@ietf.org 抄送: draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext@ietf.org; cc...@ietf.org 主题: Review of

Re: [Gen-art] [DMM] Review of draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04

Hi Charlie, Please see inline. From: dmm > on behalf of Charlie Perkins > Date: Friday, February 10, 2017 at 2:28 PM To: Dale Worley

[Gen-art] 答复: Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext-08

Thanks Pete, then I prefer to keep it as it is, i.e., use the term 'should'. Best wishes, Haomian -邮件原件- 发件人: Pete Resnick [mailto:presn...@qti.qualcomm.com] 发送时间: 2017年2月13日 9:54 收件人: Zhenghaomian 抄送: gen-art@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext@ietf.org;

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04

Charlie Perkins writes: > > Are there any other types "in common use"? > > I will add some text according to your suggestion. My criterion for > whether the identifier type was included in the document was whether or > not anyone had asked for it to be included.

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext-08

[Trimming down] On 12 Feb 2017, at 19:22, Zhenghaomian wrote: 3.2: Hence, in order to support all possible applications and implementations the following information should be advertised for a flexi-grid DWDM link: Is that "should" in there meant to be normative? That is, do bad