Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team
(Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF
Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
For more
Paul,
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017, at 10:14 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> I'm on tap to do the genart telechat review on
> draft-baeuerle-netnews-cancel-lock-06. I see that nothing has been done
> about the ABNF that was my primary concern in my prior wglc review of
> -05:
>
>
Hi all,
> optional-field =
>
> news-fields = approved /
> archive /
> control /
> distribution /
> expires /
> followup-to /
> injection-date /
>
Hi Alexey,
The question is: in the meantime, what to do about this draft? By
default I guess I will simply restate the issue in my genart telechat
review and leave it for the IESG discuss it.
As per my comments above, I think we should acknowledge that there is a
subtle issue with ABNF in RFC
Hi Paul,
Even then, ideally there should have been some words to indicate that
the s used as extensions for trace be disjoint from those
used as non-trace extension headers.
It gets more ugly when we start to extends
syntactically via =/. Now, when the syntax is evaluated the new header
On 9/19/17 2:41 PM, Pete Resnick wrote:
On 19 Sep 2017, at 9:23, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
optional-field =/ *( approved /
archive /
control /
distribution /
expires /
followup-to /
injection-date /
Hi Paul,
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017, at 10:14 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> I'm on tap to do the genart telechat review on
> draft-baeuerle-netnews-cancel-lock-06. I see that nothing has been done
> about the ABNF that was my primary concern in my prior wglc review of
> -05:
>
>
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017, at 10:42 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017, at 10:14 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> > I'm on tap to do the genart telechat review on
> > draft-baeuerle-netnews-cancel-lock-06. I see that nothing has been done
> > about the ABNF that was my primary
On 9/19/17 8:13 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
We can also drop "*" in front of "(approved", as this field is already
allowed multiple times in an RFC 5322 message.
archive /
control /
distribution /
Hi Paul,
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017, at 03:00 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> Hi Alexey,
>
> On 9/19/17 5:42 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017, at 10:14 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> >> I'm on tap to do the genart telechat review on
> >> draft-baeuerle-netnews-cancel-lock-06.
Hi Alexey,
On 9/19/17 5:42 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
Hi Paul,
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017, at 10:14 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
I'm on tap to do the genart telechat review on
draft-baeuerle-netnews-cancel-lock-06. I see that nothing has been done
about the ABNF that was my primary concern in my prior
Hi Alia,
Yes, I am aware about this. Yet, there is this little sentence in the WG
charter which does not seem to be answered by now :-)
'The scope of the experiment will be documented in the output of the
Working Group.'
Regards,
Dan
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:46 PM, Alia Atlas
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
On 19 Sep 2017, at 9:23, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
optional-field =/ *( approved /
archive /
control /
distribution /
expires /
followup-to /
14 matches
Mail list logo
