Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-20

All the way down... On 11.04.18 18:15, Robert Sparks wrote: > >> >> Similarly, the use of the word standardized naked like that is >> probably unhelpful. > Can I infer you plan to edit it out or dress it more? Yes. >> One could imagine, for instance, Fairhair or some other consortium >>

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-20

On 4/11/18 1:35 AM, Eliot Lear wrote: Hi Robert, A few additional comments below: On 10.04.18 16:22, Robert Sparks wrote: On 4/10/18 5:43 AM, Eliot Lear wrote: Hi Robert and thanks again for the review.  Please see below for responses.  These are my personal views.  The WG chairs /

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-20

On 4/11/18 11:58 AM, Eliot Lear wrote: All the way down... On 11.04.18 18:15, Robert Sparks wrote: Similarly, the use of the word standardized naked like that is probably unhelpful. Can I infer you plan to edit it out or dress it more? Yes. One could imagine, for instance, Fairhair

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-20

Hi Robert, A few additional comments below: On 10.04.18 16:22, Robert Sparks wrote: > > > > On 4/10/18 5:43 AM, Eliot Lear wrote: >> >> Hi Robert and thanks again for the review.  Please see below for >> responses.  These are my personal views.  The WG chairs / shepherds >> may have different