Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions-05

> > Thank you Dan for your time and comments. > I'll fix them for the next revision. > > Best regards, > Ori > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019, 12:09 Dan Romascanu via Datatracker < > nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > >> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu >> Review result: Ready with Nits >> >> I am the assigned Gen-ART

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types-09

Linda, thanks for your review. Igor, thanks for your response. I’ve entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On May 15, 2019, at 4:51 PM, Linda Dunbar wrote: > > Igor, > > Thank you very much for the reply. > Are you saying that all the "common TE types" in this document have been >

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lpwan-ipv6-static-context-hc-21

Pete, thanks for your review. I referenced it in my No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Aug 6, 2019, at 11:13 PM, Pete Resnick via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Pete Resnick > Review result: Ready with Issues > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions-05

Thank you Dan for your time and comments. I'll fix them for the next revision. Best regards, Ori On Tue, Aug 20, 2019, 12:09 Dan Romascanu via Datatracker wrote: > Reviewer: Dan Romascanu > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-lamps-cms-mix-with-psk-06

Robert, thanks for your reviews of this document. Russ, thanks for addressing Robert’s comments. I entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Aug 16, 2019, at 10:21 AM, Robert Sparks via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-11

Dhruv, Thanks for addressing my concerns. Regarding (C-E / E-C) and (EC-EP / EP-EC): I recognized that there was more to it, and that using "E" for P-PCE in this document would be problematic. I guess this is just a conflict between documents that has to be tolerated. And it hadn't dawned

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-11

Thanks for the detailed review. We can address these NITS in a new version. BR, Dan. -Original Message- From: Paul Kyzivat Sent: 20 August 2019 17:29 To: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce@ietf.org Cc: General Area Review Team Subject: Gen-ART Last Call review of

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-11

Hi Paul, Thanks for your review, please see inline... On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 9:58 PM Paul Kyzivat wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-oauth-mtls-15

Meral, thanks for your review. I entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Aug 2, 2019, at 3:11 AM, Meral Shirazipour > wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the >

Re: [Gen-art] [manet] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-manet-dlep-lid-extension-05

Stewart, thanks for your review. Rick, thanks for agreeing to make the changes. I enetered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Aug 6, 2019, at 5:50 AM, Rick Taylor > wrote: > > Hi Stewart, > > Thanks for the prompt review. We will wait for a few more reviews and > publish a fixed