[Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-iptel-tel-np-09

Attached is my review of the specified document, submitted as part of the Gen-ART process. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Document: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-iptel-tel-np-09.txt Comments: The docum

[Gen-art] review of draft-kornijenko-ivis-urn-00.txt

Summary: basically ready with nits I strongly recommend to convert the document to a tool like xml2rfc before to send it to the RFC editor! Other concerns: - the document should specify which kind of namespace registration is asked for (I've assume "formal") - so there must be an IANA consid

RE: [Gen-art] Assignments for April 27th, 2006

I've uploaded the most recent reviews (mostly LCs) and updated the spreadsheet accordingly. Please let me know if I've missed anything. Mary -Original Message- From: Barnes, Mary [RICH2:B601:EXCH] Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 8:03 PM To: gen-art@ietf.org Subject: [Gen-art] Assignment

RE: [rddp] Re: [Gen-art] IETF LC reviews: rddp security andapplicability

Thank you. The changes you propose would address the minor issues. Yours, Joel At 10:31 AM 4/25/2006, Jim Pinkerton wrote: Thanks for the feedback Joel. Comments in-line. Jim ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman

RE: [rddp] Re: [Gen-art] IETF LC reviews: rddp security andapplicability

Thanks for the feedback Joel. Comments in-line. Jim > -Original Message- > From: Joel M. Halpern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 6:10 PM > To: Mary Barnes; gen-art@ietf.org > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; rddp@ietf.org > Subject: [rddp] Re: [Gen-art] IETF LC reviews: