I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document:
- 2 page 3: the way STD 58 is referenced is inelegant (but it seems the
issue is more in the STD 58 covering multiple RFCs...)
This is copied from the MIB boilerplate; see
http://www.ops.ietf.org/mib-boilerplate.html
The awkward references have come up a few times, but it's not
appropriate
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call
Hi Mike,
as the review says, they are just nits. If you disagree with them, feel
free to ignore them (as long as your AD is also OK with that, of course).
Cheers,
Gonzalo
C. M. Heard wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team