I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-mip4-fmipv4-07.txt Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 2007/06/01 IETF LC End Date: 2007/06/01 Summary: Ready Comments: some editorial (i.e., to be handled by the RFC editor) comments: at page 6 section 4.2: - in FA COA mode -> in FA-COA mode - for the FSU field, I propose to add a MUST somewhere, for instance: are used -> MUST be used and for each field XXX field must be -> XXX field is in 10 page 25 (and TOC pge 2): Acknowledgement -> Acknowledgment same? in 6.2 figure 4 page 11 In Security Considerations page 8 there is nothing about replay attacks, i.e., how the "come back to where you was" attack is handled? In IPv6 the protection is provided by IPsec with in the good case anti-replay, is it done in IPv4? Regards [EMAIL PROTECTED] PS: I apologize: I am late because I had to replace the disk of my notebook... _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
