Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-framework-05.txt

2008-12-16 Thread Eric Rosen
> if the "with the preshared keys" came with the "in main mode" the best and > simplest is to remove the end of the sentence, i.e.: > means of IKEv2 [RFC4306], operating in main mode with preshared keys. > -> > means of IKEv2 [RFC4306]. Okay, I will make this change.

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-softwire-encaps-safi-03.txt

2008-12-16 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Hmm. I never saw that message, although it is in the gen-art list archive. I've restored the various cc's in this reply. Yes, these changes look fine to me. Thanks! Brian On 2008-12-17 12:12, Pradosh Mohapatra (pmohapat) wrote: > Hi Brian, > > Following up... > > Do you have any specific

Re: [Gen-art] Assignments for 18 December 2008

2008-12-16 Thread Mary Barnes
Hi all, I have uploaded the reviews received to date, along with the updated spreadsheets. Please let me know if there are any errors or omissions. Thanks, Mary. > _ > From: Barnes, Mary (RICH2:AR00) > Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 10:51

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-framework-05.txt

2008-12-16 Thread Francis Dupont
In your previous mail you wrote: > the document is very unpleasant to read That would have to be regarded as a comment which is not actionable ;-) => if you find a magical way to improve the wording it should be very great (as a not native English writer I understand the issue but t

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-framework-05.txt

2008-12-16 Thread Eric Rosen
> the document is very unpleasant to read That would have to be regarded as a comment which is not actionable ;-) > too many authors We intend to leave the set of authors as is, and intend to remove the notation "(editor)". In my opinion, this is not an appropriate topic to be mentione

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ospf-lls-05.txt

2008-12-16 Thread Spencer Dawkins
Just as a heads-up - this document is on the agenda for the next telechat - I agree with Abhay's suggestions for changes that will appear in the "next revision", but the next revision hasn't come out yet, at least not that I've seen. Thanks! Spencer - Original Message - From: "Abhay

[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-framework-05.txt

2008-12-16 Thread Francis Dupont
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-s

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-10

2008-12-16 Thread Spencer Dawkins
All of my comments from version 7 have been addressed by the editors - ready for publication as Proposed Standard. Thanks! Spencer I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/a

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ospf-manet-mdr-03.txt

2008-12-16 Thread Spencer Dawkins
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-ospf-m