[Gen-art] review of draft-iana-rfc3330bis-06.txt

2009-04-06 Thread Francis Dupont
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-kitten-gssapi-channel-bindings-06.txt

2009-04-06 Thread Nicolas Williams
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 10:35:23AM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote: On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 10:30:21AM +1200, Brian E Carpenter wrote: Summary: Almost ready; needs one clarification. Comments: I was expecting the sentence quoted below to be updated following Nico's comments on my

[Gen-art] about draft-ietf-ccamp-path-key-ero-04.txt

2009-04-06 Thread Francis Dupont
I reviewed the version 03, I keep the Ready summary. Regards francis.dup...@fdupont.fr PS: the spelling error in 7.1 page 12 only changed, correct spelling (checked twice as it seems really hard to type :-) is: signaling (leave it to the RFC Editor...)

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-lemonade-streaming-10

2009-04-06 Thread Spencer Dawkins
Just to let people know, version 10 of this draft addresses all my questions from my -09 review. Ready to publish as Informational. Thanks, Spencer I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-kitten-gssapi-channel-bindings-06.txt

2009-04-06 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Nico, The paragraph is identical in the -05 and -06 drafts, so no, actually you didn't change anything after my review. I still find the text a little unclear. I don't feel strongly about this; Russ has just logged it as a comment, so it's up to you and Tim whether to change anything. Brian

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-kitten-gssapi-channel-bindings-06.txt

2009-04-06 Thread Nicolas Williams
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 09:09:03AM +1200, Brian E Carpenter wrote: The paragraph is identical in the -05 and -06 drafts, so no, actually you didn't change anything after my review. It differs rather slightly. I guess the current form still strikes me as clear so I didn't realize that I hadn't