I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document:
Document: draft-ietf-6man-iana-routing-header-00.txt
Reviewer: Scott Brim
Review Date: 2010-01-05
IETF LC End Date: 2010-01-12
Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC.
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
Hi, Elwyn,
Thank you very much for your review, the comments and corrections. We
will make the corrections and try to upload the new version tomorrow.
Elwyn Davies 写道:
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please
Hi, Jari,
Jari Arkko 写道:
Thank you for your review!
On quick scan the issues that you raise seem valid ones, and should be
addressed by the authors.
Thanks. We will make the corrections and try to upload the new version
tomorrow.
Best regards,
xing
Jari
Elwyn Davies kirjoitti:
I
Thank you for your review!
Jari
Scott Brim kirjoitti:
Document: draft-ohba-pana-pemk-03.txt
Reviewer: Scott Brim
Review Date: 2010-01-05
IETF LC End Date: 2010-01-01
Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC.
Thanks for your review.
Jari
Scott Brim kirjoitti:
Document: draft-ietf-6man-iana-routing-header-00.txt
Reviewer: Scott Brim
Review Date: 2010-01-05
IETF LC End Date: 2010-01-12
Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC.
On Jan 4, 2010, at 3:31 PM, Russ Housley wrote:
Ben:
This document is on the IESG Telechat agenda for approval as an Informational
RFC. I think the intent is to document actual deployment. How does this
change your review.
I think it would make all of my original major issues go away,
Hi Gen-ART people,
It's now clear that due to the SpamAssassin bug reported by Glen,
pretty much every message sent to the list between 2010-01-01 00:00*
and sometime January 4 was lost (automatically discarded) due to
a faulty spam score.
So, if you sent anything important, or if you're aware
Hi.
The new version addresses all my comments for the 802dot11 mib. Thanks.
Happy New Year.
Elwyn
Bert Wijnen (IETF) wrote:
Inline
- Original Message -
*From:* young mailto:yo...@h3c.com
*To:* black_da...@emc.com mailto:black_da...@emc.com ; 'Bert
(IETF) Wijnen'
Hi all,
I apologize for the delay - I did not get the usual email with the
agenda (they just sent a summary one), so I just totally forgot to do
this last Thursday.
Here's the link to the summary of assignments for the Jan 7, 2010
telechat:
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for
this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a
new version of the draft.
Document:
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
Hi Spencer,
Thanks for the detailed review. See inline.
Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a Proposed Standard.
In my review, I found a few uses of 2119 language that did not seem to be
justified (identified below as Spencer (minor):). The ADs should consider
whether
Thanks for your review, Spencer.
Jari
Spencer Dawkins kirjoitti:
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for
this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please wait for direction from your document
14 matches
Mail list logo