Re: [Gen-art] [abfab] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-abfab-eapapplicability-03

2013-06-20 Thread Sam Hartman
I'm fine with this text. Either with eap-lower-layer as a MUST or the more complex version. ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 2013-06-20

2013-06-20 Thread Peter Yee
Hi all, The following reviewers have assignments: Reviewer LC end Draft - Alexey Melnikov 2013-07-03 draft-ietf-multimob-pmipv6-ropt-06 Ben Campbell 2013-07-16

[Gen-art] Assignments for the 2013-06-27 telechat

2013-06-20 Thread Peter Yee
Hi all, The following reviewers have assignments: Reviewer LC end Draft Alexey Melnikov2013-06-07 draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-req-08 ** Ben Campbell 2013-06-25

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-thornburgh-adobe-rtmfp-07

2013-06-20 Thread Ben Campbell
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-thornburgh-adobe-rtmfp-07

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-thornburgh-adobe-rtmfp-07

2013-06-20 Thread Barry Leiba
-- Why does this need to be published as an IETF stream RFC? If I understand correctly, this documents an existing protocol as implemented by commercial products. I agree with Martin's comment that there is value in publishing this sort of thing, but I applaud the Adobe and the author for

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-thornburgh-adobe-rtmfp-07

2013-06-20 Thread John C Klensin
--On Thursday, June 20, 2013 22:14 -0400 Barry Leiba barryle...@computer.org wrote: FWIW, the IESG has discussed this in the context of other documents, and is looking at boilerplate that does not say that the document is a product of the IETF, and makes it clear that the content is not a

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-thornburgh-adobe-rtmfp-07

2013-06-20 Thread Ben Campbell
On Jun 20, 2013, at 9:14 PM, Barry Leiba barryle...@computer.org wrote: -- Why does this need to be published as an IETF stream RFC? If I understand correctly, this documents an existing protocol as implemented by commercial products. I agree with Martin's comment that there is value in

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-thornburgh-adobe-rtmfp-07

2013-06-20 Thread Ben Campbell
On Jun 20, 2013, at 10:12 PM, John C Klensin john-i...@jck.com wrote: p.s. I started a much more detailed response to Ben, but I think the essence of it is above. IMO, a discussion that amounts to whether or not an AD used bad judgment by choosing to sponsor an individual Informational

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-avtcore-avp-codecs-02.txt

2013-06-20 Thread Brian E Carpenter
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-alto-server-discovery-08

2013-06-20 Thread Meral Shirazipour
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-alto-server-discovery-08