Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art Early Review of draft-ietf-radext-dtls-07

Thanks Ben for the review! - JOuni On Nov 19, 2013, at 1:38 AM, Ben Campbell b...@nostrum.com wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. This is an early review at

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-sin-sdnrg-sdn-approach-05.txt

Hello Suresh, Thanks for your review. We will update the draft in light of your comments, but please see inline a few responses. [snip] * Section 2.1 - Not sure if the word encoded is appropriate here. s/hardware-encoded/usually implemented in hardware/ [CJ] OK. - These two sentences are

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review for draft-ietf-soc-load-control-event-package-10.txt

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

Re: [Gen-art] #520, was: Fwd: Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24 with security considerations

Hi Mark Julian, I understand your concerns, but I think a *couple of sentences* could go a long way in terms of awareness of these issues for developers and implementers. This type of advice is on par with the current security sections added for privacy concerns where you get close to the

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-14

-- The document seems to lack a disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 work, but may have content which was first submitted before 10 November 2008. If you have contacted all the original authors and they are all willing to grant the BCP78 rights to the IETF Trust, then this is fine,

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-6man-ug-05

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-6man-ug-05 Reviewer: Martin

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-karp-ops-model-09

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-ipfix-data-link-layer-monitoring-07

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-art telechat review of draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-38.txt

I have been selected as an additional General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Re: [Gen-art] #520, was: Fwd: Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24 with security considerations

Hi Kathleen, Personally - I'm not convinced, because the people who would benefit from that warning are almost certainly not going to be reading this document. We're already getting a lot of pushback on the size of our document set; we've often resisted adding advice like this to keep it

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-cdni-requirements-12

OK. Thanks for the clarification. Appreciate your feedback. :) Kent From: Christer Holmberg [mailto:christer.holmb...@ericsson.com] Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 11:58 PM To: Kent Leung (kleung); gen-art@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-cdni-requirements@tools.ietf.org Subject: RE: Gen-ART review