Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-g723-g729-04.txt

2014-01-29 Thread Ari Keränen
Hi, Regarding this change, I think we should keep the original version since this is a direct quote from RFC4856. Cheers, Ari On 29/01/14 07:07, Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal (mperumal) wrote: |- 1 page 3 (wording suggestion): implied if - implied when Addressed.

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-g723-g729-04.txt

2014-01-29 Thread Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal (mperumal)
Hi Francis, We have incorporated your comments in the next revision (will be publishing it shortly). |- Abstract page 1: usually the Abstract should not reference an RFC | by its number. IMHO here it is the exception: the I-D will be | included into the next revision of the RFC. We have

Re: [Gen-art] [imapext] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis-09

2014-01-29 Thread Eliot Lear
Alexey, On 1/28/14, 9:37 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: I think David's right that some version of what Eliot said: there is a requirement for strict syntax parsing. If the client blows it in any way, the server SHOULD return an error with a BAD response. ...should be added to the section

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-g723-g729-04.txt

2014-01-29 Thread Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal (mperumal)
Hi Ari, Good catch. Will retrain the existing text for this one.. thanks, Muthu |-Original Message- |From: Ari Keränen [mailto:ari.kera...@ericsson.com] |Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 5:16 PM |To: Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal (mperumal); Parthasarathi R; francis.dup...@fdupont.fr;