Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10

2017-02-26 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Looks good to me, thanks. Regards Brian On 27/02/2017 14:22, Mark Nottingham wrote: > [ editor hat ] > > That all seems reasonable to me; see: > > https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/ca56fd8365 > https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/31c11b4683 > > Will

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10

2017-02-26 Thread Mark Nottingham
[ editor hat ] That all seems reasonable to me; see: https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/ca56fd8365 https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/31c11b4683 Will incorporate into the next draft when we issue. Thanks! > On 26 Feb 2017, at 12:20 pm, Brian Carpenter

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-17

2017-02-26 Thread Russ Housley
Reviewer: Russ Housley Review result: Almost Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-dane-smime-15

2017-02-26 Thread Dale Worley
Reviewer: Dale Worley Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-ext-12

2017-02-26 Thread Roni Even
Reviewer: Roni Even Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information,