Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-19

Thanks to you, Dan! — Carlos Pignataro, car...@cisco.com “Sometimes I use big words that I do not fully understand, to make myself sound more photosynthesis." On Aug 31, 2017, at 11:56 PM, Dan Romascanu > wrote: Hi

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-19

Hi Carlos, Thank you for addressing my comments. Your suggested edits seem to address the issues. Regards, Dan On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 3:55 AM, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) < cpign...@cisco.com> wrote: > Hi, Dan, > > Many thanks for your detailed and valuable review, and apologies for the >

[Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation-05

Reviewer: Brian Carpenter Review result: Ready with Issues Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation-05 I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair.

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-19

Hi, Dan, Many thanks for your detailed and valuable review, and apologies for the delay in Ack-ing and responding. Please see inline. — Carlos Pignataro, car...@cisco.com “Sometimes I use big words that I do not fully understand, to make myself sound more photosynthesis." > On Aug 22, 2017,

[Gen-art] Review Assignments

Hi all, The following reviewers have assignments: For telechat 2017-08-31 Reviewer Type LC end Draft Fernando Gont Last Call 2017-08-24 draft-ietf-pals-p2mp-pw-03 Vijay Gurbani Last Call 2017-08-24 draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5667bis-13 For telechat 2017-09-14

Re: [Gen-art] Genart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-08

Robert, As I wrote earlier, this was a great review.  Thanks for that.  Please see below. On 8/30/17 7:21 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review result: Almost Ready > > This is an exciting concept, and the draft overall is approachable. I > have identified a few areas I

Re: [Gen-art] [OPSAWG] Genart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-08

Hi Eliot, Reply in line below: On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 4:41 AM, Eliot Lear wrote: > Hi Ranga, > > Robert wrote a great review, and I'll respond to him in due course with > suggested changes. I wanted to take just a moment to comment to you on > your point: > > On 8/31/17 12:00

Re: [Gen-art] [OPSAWG] Genart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-08

Hi Ranga, Robert wrote a great review, and I'll respond to him in due course with suggested changes.  I wanted to take just a moment to comment to you on your point: On 8/31/17 12:00 AM, M. Ranganathan wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Robert Sparks

Re: [Gen-art] [OPSAWG] Genart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-08

I think we need to bear in mind that the MUD files constitute recommendations for how a device should be treated and what policies/security should be applied to it by a network. This draft, in itself, cannot allow a manufacturer to actually proscribe anything. Today, the only way to achieve