Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-11

Ok.  I'll push an update based on these changes in the next few days, barring additional comments. On 30.01.18 17:02, Dan Romascanu wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 5:54 PM, Alissa Cooper > wrote: > > > > On Jan 29, 2018, at 1:12 PM, Pete

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-11

On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 5:54 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote: > > > On Jan 29, 2018, at 1:12 PM, Pete Resnick > wrote: > > > > > >> 8. Section 4: > >> > >> 'It is anticipated that > >> those roles will evolve. The IASA is responsible for keeping the > >>

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-11

> On Jan 29, 2018, at 1:12 PM, Pete Resnick wrote: > > >> 8. Section 4: >> >> 'It is anticipated that >> those roles will evolve. The IASA is responsible for keeping the >> community informed in this regard, and MAY do so without updating >> this memo.' >>

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-term-07

Reviewer: Stewart Bryant Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For

Re: [Gen-art] [FORGED] Genart telechat review of draft-gutmann-scep-08

>However, there are some issues (mostly editorial) that I would like the >authors to address. One comment on this, I didn't write the original text so I'll try and accommodate as much as possible, but in some cases I've had to guess at what the original authors intended. Also, the explanations