Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5750-bis-05

These are references to ASN.1 definitions, so they should not be changed as indicated. Russ > On Apr 27, 2018, at 7:28 AM, Ines Robles > wrote: > > Section 2.3: CertificateSet --> Certificate Set > > Section 4.4.1: basicConstraints --> basic Constraints

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5750-bis-05

Reviewer: Ines Robles Review result: Ready with Issues Hello, I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-2330-ipv6-04

Hi Al, Thanks for your reply. I cut selected parts of the email to detail some of my comments, see inline. Francesca > > (About MUST, was there any specific reason not to use the updated > > boilerplate referencing RFC8174?) > > > [acm] > You mean the Requirements Language RFC has been