Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-push-20

2019-07-02 Thread Tom Pusateri
> On Jun 28, 2019, at 4:03 PM, Robert Sparks via Datatracker > wrote: > > Issue: > > The discussion of recursive resolvers in section 6.1 may need additional > consideration. In particular, the recommendation to pass a received error code > along to a client has, I think, some unintended

Re: [Gen-art] [dnssd] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-push-20

2019-07-02 Thread Robert Sparks
inline On 7/2/19 1:36 PM, Tom Pusateri wrote: On Jun 28, 2019, at 4:03 PM, Robert Sparks via Datatracker wrote: Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents

Re: [Gen-art] [dnssd] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-push-20

2019-07-02 Thread Tom Pusateri
> On Jun 28, 2019, at 4:03 PM, Robert Sparks via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review result: Ready with Issues > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-6tisch-architecture-20.txt

2019-07-02 Thread Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
Hello Francis Many thanks for your review. It clearly indicates a thorough reading, this is much appreciated. I fixed all the nits in -24. Please see nbelow: > - 1 page 3: the IT abbrev is not introduced > > - 2.1 page 5 (bundle), page 9 (slotOffset), 4.61 page 38 (2.): i.e. -> i.e., > > -