Dear Elwyn,
Thanks a lot for the review! Please see inline below.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 8:45 PM Elwyn Davies via Datatracker <
nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
> Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
> Review result: Almost Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team
Hi Laurent,
Thanks for the new revision, which greatly improves the document.
However, I have a few comments on your new text:
In the text at the beginning of Section 3, you added text to give more
context, which is a great idea.
However, I'm not sure about the first sentence:
"SCHC with CoAP
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Hi Jouni,
Thanks for the review. Responses below.
> On 9 Mar 2020, at 7:19 am, Jouni Korhonen via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all
Hi Roni,
Inline ...
Thanks, --David
> -Original Message-
> From: detnet On Behalf Of Roni Even via
> Datatracker
> Sent: Monday, March 9, 2020 10:44 AM
> To: gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: last-c...@ietf.org; det...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-detnet-ip@ietf.org
> Subject: [Detnet] Genart last
Dan, thanks for your reviews. Authors, thanks for your responses. I entered a
No Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On Mar 9, 2020, at 11:40 AM, Dan Romascanu via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
> Review result: Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The
Pete, thanks for your review. Tom, thanks for your response. I entered a
DISCUSS ballot to get the maturity level fixed.
Best,
Alissa
> On Mar 5, 2020, at 2:17 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
>
> Hi Pete,
>
> Thanks for the review. Comments inline.
>
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 11:02 AM Pete Resnick
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
Hi Jari,
Thank you for the answer and for addressing the issues raised in my review.
Looks fine to me by now, I am waiting for version -07 to check the precise
edits.
Regards,
Dan
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 2:28 PM Jari Arkko wrote:
> Thanks for your review, Dan.
>
> Some responses below. We
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Hi Linda,
Thank you. I will apply the new version later today.
Regards,
Giuseppe
-Original Message-
From: Linda Dunbar [mailto:linda.dun...@futurewei.com]
Sent: Friday, March 6, 2020 9:01 PM
To: Giuseppe Fioccola ; gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-ippm-multipoint-alt-mark@ietf.org;
Thanks for your review, Dan.
Some responses below. We are also about to publish a new document version.
> This is a very detailed and well-written document that describes a new
> specification of the specification of EAP-AKA' to support 5G deployments. This
> specification is ready, but I have a
12 matches
Mail list logo
