Version -17 of the draft is submitted, with intention to have all Genart
and Secdir review comments resolved.
The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-party-rtt-mix/
There is also an HTML version available at:
Peter,
I have made the extra few adjustments you proposed.
For the use of "disappeared", I agree that it is an unusual term in this
context.
I checked RFC 4575, and there it is said that users "depart" or
"disconnect" from a conference. "Disconnect" feels most familiar, so I
propose to
Dear Russ,
Thank you for the review and the comments. Please find the following answers to
your comments below. I have modified the draft and uploaded a -13 version.
> Major Concerns:
> Section 7.2.1: Does the SHALL related to [SMPTE-ST2110-10] only apply when
> TP=2110TPNL or TP=2110TPW?
Responses prefixed with [PEY] below.
Kind regards,
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Gunnar Hellström [mailto:gunnar.hellst...@ghaccess.se]
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2021 11:36 AM
To: Peter Yee; gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: a...@ietf.org;
Thanks for the quick response, Gunnar. I've prefaced my replies below with
[PEY].
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Gunnar Hellström [mailto:gunnar.hellst...@ghaccess.se]
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2021 2:14 PM
To: Peter Yee; gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: a...@ietf.org;
Continuing with comments and edit proposals from "Nits/editorial
comments:" below.
Den 2021-05-06 kl. 05:41, skrev Peter Yee via Datatracker:
Reviewer: Peter Yee
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews
Tim:
> Thank you for the review and the comments. Please find the following answers
> to your comments below. I have modified the draft and uploaded a -13 version.
>
>
>> Major Concerns:
>> Section 7.2.1: Does the SHALL related to [SMPTE-ST2110-10] only apply when
>> TP=2110TPNL or
