Hi Christer,
Thanks for the review. I do agree with you the introduction is taken as a
whole quite long. Its current structure resulted from (multiple)
discussions where we have been told to clarify some upcoming questions many
people in the group would come up with and needed to be clarified.
Hi Ines,
Thanks for the reviews. We can of course include 7227 and I added the
reference as follows:
This section details the payload of the DHCPv6 options following the
guidelines of {
{?RFC7227}}.
Regarding your second comment, I think what we meant is that the trust
associated with the
Reviewer: Ines Robles
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Looks good, thanks!
On 9/26/22, 10:44 PM, "mohamed.boucad...@orange.com"
wrote:
Hi Tim,
Thank you for the review.
You can track the changes made to address your comments at:
https://tinyurl.com/dots-robust-latest. FWIW, please see inline for more
context.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
