On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 4:33 PM David Schinazi
wrote:
> Hi Vijay, and thank you for your review!
>
> The distinction between MUST and SHALL in this document is intentional. We
> use MUST to indicate "if X happens, then you MUST do Y" whereas we use
> SHALL to indicate "The procedure is as
Hi Vijay, and thank you for your review!
The distinction between MUST and SHALL in this document is intentional. We
use MUST to indicate "if X happens, then you MUST do Y" whereas we use
SHALL to indicate "The procedure is as follows: step 1 you SHALL do Z".
Based on previous RFCs published by
Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Thank you Elwyn for the review comments, I'm sure the nits are well appreciated!
> General: I am concerned about the long term stability of the web site
> referenced for the Matroska Container Format, reference [MCF]. Among other
> issues it is not accessed via https and it claims that it is
