Re: [Gen-art] [dtn] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dtn-ipn-update-09

2024-02-07 Thread scott
Hi Rick, That certainly clarifies the situation in my mind. Thanks, I appreciate it! Scott On Wed, 7 Feb 2024, Rick Taylor wrote: Hi Scott, One of the purposes of wanting to "update" RFC7116 was to absolutely clarify the situation as regards applicability with different bundle protocol

Re: [Gen-art] [dtn] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dtn-ipn-update-09

2024-02-07 Thread Felix Flentge
FYI, CCSDS is in the process of re-confirming CCSDS 734.1-B-1 (LTP for CCSDS) as part of the 5-years review cycle. There are no updates to the normative part of the document planned; just couple of comments and recommendations will be added. As 734.1-B-1 includes normative references to 7116

Re: [Gen-art] [dtn] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dtn-ipn-update-09

2024-02-07 Thread Rick Taylor
Hi Scott, One of the purposes of wanting to "update" RFC7116 was to absolutely clarify the situation as regards applicability with different bundle protocol versions, as you are correct that there is no IRTF/IETF guidance. The main point of discussion here is about IETF process: obsoleting

Re: [Gen-art] [Jmap] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-jmap-sieve-17

2024-02-07 Thread Ines Robles
Thank you Kenneth for addressing my comments. The changes are Ok for me. Best Regards, Ines. On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 6:58 PM Ken Murchison wrote: > Hi Ines, > > Thanks for the detailed review. I used you input to produce draft -18. > Comments inline. > > > On 2/2/24 3:42 PM, Ines Robles via