> On Aug 30, 2020, at 6:14 PM, Dale Worley via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Dale Worley
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF
>> In this case, timely is most about user perception. If the now dysfunctional
>> address remains in use long enough for the user to become annoyed (or
>> arguably
>> even notice), then recovery is not timely. Since the definition of timely in
>> this case is actually subjective, I’m not sure
>> Despite the fact that RFCs prohibit hosts from reducing the valid
>> lifetime to less than 2 hours in response to a received RA, some
>> routers do send such RAs and some hosts do (in violation of the
>> standards) deprecate the prefixes accordingly. This is kind of a
>> no-win situation
