Re: [Gen-art] [IPsec] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-12

Christer, thank you for your review. Tommy, thank you for addressing Christer’s comments. I entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Oct 22, 2018, at 4:26 PM, Tommy Pauly wrote: > > Hi Christer, > > Thanks again for the review. I've addressed all three comments below in an > update to

Re: [Gen-art] [IPsec] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-12

Hi Christer, Thanks again for the review. I've addressed all three comments below in an update to the draft: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-13

Re: [Gen-art] [IPsec] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-12

Hi Tommy, Please see inline. Minor issues: Q1: >> Section 3.1 contains some SHOULD-do statements, e.g.,: >> >> "the initiator SHOULD also include one or more INTERNAL_IP4_DNS and >> INTERNAL_IP6_DNS attributes in the CFG_REQUEST" >> >> "the initiator SHOULD also include one or more