Re: [Gen-art] [Slim] Review of draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language-06

At 10:34 AM -0500 2/23/17, Dale R. Worley wrote: Randall Gellens writes: Thanks, Dale. It seems that it would be useful for the draft to suggest (not require) that a session rejected due to lack of mutually-supported languages use 488 or 606, and also include

Re: [Gen-art] [Slim] Review of draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language-06

At 10:42 AM -0500 2/22/17, Dale R. Worley wrote: Gunnar Hellström writes: A. Call failure If a call fails due to no available language match, in what way(s) does it fail? Section 5.3 says If such an offer is received, the receiver MAY reject

Re: [Gen-art] [Slim] Review of draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language-06

At 11:57 AM +0100 2/22/17, Gunnar Hellström wrote: A few comments inline, Den 2017-02-22 kl. 02:44, skrev Randall Gellens: Hi Dale, Thank you for your review, I appreciate it. Please see inline. At 6:32 PM -0800 2/17/17, Dale Worley wrote: Reviewer: Dale Worley Review result:

Re: [Gen-art] [Slim] Review of draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language-06

A few comments inline, Den 2017-02-22 kl. 02:44, skrev Randall Gellens: Hi Dale, Thank you for your review, I appreciate it. Please see inline. At 6:32 PM -0800 2/17/17, Dale Worley wrote: Reviewer: Dale Worley Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this