Thanks for the review and the updates. Did you Marc react to Roni’s last
comment, or did that already get folded in -04?
Jari
P.S. Section 4.3 has some broken XML reference construct.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gen-art
Hi Jari,
On 6/25/14, 9:20 AM, Jari Arkko wrote:
Thanks for the review and the updates. Did you Marc react to Roni’s last
comment, or did that already get folded in -04?
Yes, Section 4.3 in -04 was modified to make clear that it applies only
to the STUN Indication method of keep-alive.
Good. Thank you.
Jari
On 25 Jun 2014, at 16:30, Marc Petit-Huguenin mar...@getjive.com wrote:
Hi Jari,
On 6/25/14, 9:20 AM, Jari Arkko wrote:
Thanks for the review and the updates. Did you Marc react to Roni’s last
comment, or did that already get folded in -04?
Yes, Section 4.3 in
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-tram-stun-dtls-03
Reviewer:
Hi Roni,
See my answers below.
On 6/23/14, 7:28 AM, Roni Even wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call
@tools.ietf.org;
gen-art@ietf.org;
i...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tram-stun-dtls-03
Hi Roni,
See my answers below.
On 6/23/14, 7:28 AM, Roni Even wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ
