...@ietf.org
主题: Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model-16
That's certainly a valid option, but if you limit it to NAT44 I strongly
suggest *calling* it NAT44, not plain NAT.
Regards
Brian Carpenter
On 10/10/2016 21:55, Qin Wu wrote:
> Not sure we should enumerate
; -Original Message-
> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2016 02:08
> To: LITKOWSKI Stephane OBS/OINIS;
> draft-ietf-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model@ietf.org; General Area Review Team;
> l...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Gen-ART La
;
General Area Review Team; l...@ietf.org
主题: RE: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model-16
For NAT, I would like to hear opinion for other people before doing the change.
And additional options can be added through augmentation. One solution is to
limit to IPv4 case which
]
Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2016 02:08
To: LITKOWSKI Stephane OBS/OINIS;
draft-ietf-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model@ietf.org; General Area Review Team;
l...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model-16
[N.B. I have added the l3sm list but I am
[N.B. I have added the l3sm list but I am not subscribed]
On 07/10/2016 20:46, stephane.litkow...@orange.com wrote:
...
>>> 5.12.2.2. QoS profile
...
> [SLI2] The current model supports classification based on generic DSCP
> values. Isn't it enough ?
Yes, I missed that. I agree, that seems
features forever.
> IMO, it's time to declare victory on this service YANG model.
>
> Regards, Benoit
>> Hi Brian,
>>
>> More inline.
>>
>> Brgds,
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Th
--Original Message-
From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2016 21:58
To: LITKOWSKI Stephane OBS/OINIS;
draft-ietf-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model@ietf.org; General Area Review Team
Subject: Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-l3sm-l3vpn-ser
Stephane,
Thanks for the response and the proposed updates. Some follow-up on a few
points:
On 06/10/2016 21:46, stephane.litkow...@orange.com wrote:
...
>> 5.3.2.2.1. IP addressing
> ...
>>o slaac : enables stateless address autoconfiguration ([RFC4862]).
>> This is applicable only
review of draft-ietf-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model-16
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team
(Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF
Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
For more
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
10 matches
Mail list logo
