Hi Robert,
Thanks now for BOTH of your reviews. I've a number of proposals below.
On 9/7/17 5:51 PM, Robert Sparks wrote:
> There is one aspect of caching semantics we should probably capture,
> which is that the cache-validity period should exceed the HTTP cache
> or expiry period as
Apologies for being a little laggy -
Some comments inline.
On 8/31/17 2:07 PM, Eliot Lear wrote:
Robert,
As I wrote earlier, this was a great review. Thanks for that. Please
see below.
On 8/30/17 7:21 PM, Robert Sparks wrote:
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Almost Ready
This
Robert,
As I wrote earlier, this was a great review. Thanks for that. Please
see below.
On 8/30/17 7:21 PM, Robert Sparks wrote:
> Reviewer: Robert Sparks
> Review result: Almost Ready
>
> This is an exciting concept, and the draft overall is approachable. I
> have identified a few areas I
This draft raises some fascinating questions. One is "How do we ensure
that the manufacturer cannot proscribe the uses of a device that it is
capable of and that its purchaser desires?" Another is "How do we
ensure that the manufacturer cannot reduce the permitted uses of the
device after its
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Almost Ready
This is an exciting concept, and the draft overall is approachable. I
have identified a few areas I think need more detail, and have a
longish list of nits (please don't take that to be negative).
==Issues==
I find the structure of the
