Hi Stewart,
As responsible AD I like to add a bit here. Please see inline. The WG will still
need to discuss how to address these comments.
Regarding the "pre-allocation" of certain bits and code-points, I would tend to
agree. I think one can put tham as reserved in this specification. And in
Following offline discussions with an IETF collegue, I would like to add a
number of points regarding the timing material in the draft.
1) It would be better to reference POSIX time (with a reference) than UNIX
time.
2) There will be a Y2038 and Y2106 rollover which users need to be aware of
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review result: Not Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
