Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile-13

2019-08-06 Thread Alissa Cooper
Pete, thanks for your review. Fred, thanks for updating the text. I entered a DISCUSS ballot to chat about Section 6.1. Alissa > On Jul 6, 2019, at 1:11 AM, Pete Resnick wrote: > > On 5 Jul 2019, at 10:00, Fred Baker wrote: > >>> In Section 2.1 and 2.2, Instead of "set to one" and "set to

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile-13

2019-07-05 Thread Pete Resnick
On 5 Jul 2019, at 10:00, Fred Baker wrote: In Section 2.1 and 2.2, Instead of "set to one" and "set to zero", it would read easier with "set to (1)" and "set to (0)", or some similar construction. That seems to me to be stylistic - I'm not at all sure what makes "(1)" more readable than

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile-13

2019-07-04 Thread Pete Resnick via Datatracker
Reviewer: Pete Resnick Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more