Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-20

Robert, thanks for your review. Eliot, thanks for addressing Robert’s comments. I have entered a Yes ballot. Alissa > On Apr 12, 2018, at 8:17 AM, Eliot Lear wrote: > > Hi Robert and everyone else, > > Circling for a landing here... > > On 11.04.18 18:15, Robert Sparks

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-20

Hi Robert and everyone else, Circling for a landing here... On 11.04.18 18:15, Robert Sparks wrote: > With this, I'm puzzled about the use of the word standardized at all. > I think I'm hearing that you expect MUD controllers to know about some > well-known classes by convention and that groups

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-20

On 4/11/18 11:58 AM, Eliot Lear wrote: All the way down... On 11.04.18 18:15, Robert Sparks wrote: Similarly, the use of the word standardized naked like that is probably unhelpful. Can I infer you plan to edit it out or dress it more? Yes. One could imagine, for instance, Fairhair

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-20

All the way down... On 11.04.18 18:15, Robert Sparks wrote: > >> >> Similarly, the use of the word standardized naked like that is >> probably unhelpful. > Can I infer you plan to edit it out or dress it more? Yes. >> One could imagine, for instance, Fairhair or some other consortium >>

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-20

On 4/11/18 1:35 AM, Eliot Lear wrote: Hi Robert, A few additional comments below: On 10.04.18 16:22, Robert Sparks wrote: On 4/10/18 5:43 AM, Eliot Lear wrote: Hi Robert and thanks again for the review.  Please see below for responses.  These are my personal views.  The WG chairs /

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-20

Hi Robert, A few additional comments below: On 10.04.18 16:22, Robert Sparks wrote: > > > > On 4/10/18 5:43 AM, Eliot Lear wrote: >> >> Hi Robert and thanks again for the review.  Please see below for >> responses.  These are my personal views.  The WG chairs / shepherds >> may have different

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-20

On 4/10/18 06:43, Eliot Lear wrote: > With that in mind, I propose the following edit: > > DHCP servers may implement MUD functionality themselves or they may > pass along appropriate information to a network management system or > MUD controller.  A DHCP server that does process the MUD URL MUST

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-20

On 4/10/18 5:43 AM, Eliot Lear wrote: Hi Robert and thanks again for the review.  Please see below for responses.  These are my personal views.  The WG chairs / shepherds may have different opinions. Thank you for the very quick response! On 09.04.18 19:57, Robert Sparks wrote:

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-20

Hi Robert and thanks again for the review.  Please see below for responses.  These are my personal views.  The WG chairs / shepherds may have different opinions. On 09.04.18 19:57, Robert Sparks wrote: > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review result: Ready with Issues > > I am the assigned Gen-ART

[Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-20

Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting