Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-bbf-bbf-urn-02

Thanks for the review & the edits. jari On 24 Nov 2016, at 02:24, Joel Halpern wrote: > The new version addresses my concerns and is ready for publication as an > informational RFC. > > Yours, > Joel M. Halpern > > On 10/14/16 4:51 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: >> I am

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-bbf-bbf-urn-02

The new version addresses my concerns and is ready for publication as an informational RFC. Yours, Joel M. Halpern On 10/14/16 4:51 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-bbf-bbf-urn-02

Thanks Barbarra. With regard to the assignment process text, what you have would work. I would suggest dropping the text about membership and simply talking about going through the BBF document creation and approval process. Yours, Joel On 10/27/16 12:53 PM, STARK, BARBARA H wrote: Hi

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-bbf-bbf-urn-02

Hi Joel, > Major issues: > RFC 3406 states that the namespace considerations section should indicate > why a new namespace is needed. While this is pretty obvious, the text does > not actually say anything in that section to explain it. > In particular, I would expect that section to

[Gen-art] Review: draft-bbf-bbf-urn-02

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at