Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-13

2017-01-18 Thread Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
Just to close this thread. We had an offline discussion with Robert and posted a new revision with his comments incorporated. Below are the changes In security consideration section we added: When using BFCP over websockets, the security mechanisms defined in [I-D.ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis] are

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-13

2017-01-18 Thread Jari Arkko
Many thanks for this substantive review, Robert. I think we should finish this discussion and figure out what changes may be needed, before we can complete the approval for this doc. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-13

2017-01-17 Thread Robert Sparks
On 1/15/17 11:36 PM, Ram Mohan R (rmohanr) wrote: Hi Robert, Thanks for your review. Please see inline -Original Message- From: Robert Sparks Date: Thursday, 5 January 2017 at 4:05 AM To: "gen-art@ietf.org" Cc:

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-13

2017-01-15 Thread Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
Hi Robert, Thanks for your review. Please see inline >-Original Message- >From: Robert Sparks >Date: Thursday, 5 January 2017 at 4:05 AM >To: "gen-art@ietf.org" >Cc: "draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket@ietf.org"

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-13

2017-01-04 Thread Robert Sparks
Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For