Just to close this thread. We had an offline discussion with Robert and posted
a new revision with his comments incorporated. Below are the changes
In security consideration section we added:
When using BFCP over websockets, the security mechanisms defined in
[I-D.ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis] are
Many thanks for this substantive review, Robert.
I think we should finish this discussion and figure out what changes may be
needed, before we can complete the approval for this doc.
Jari
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
On 1/15/17 11:36 PM, Ram Mohan R (rmohanr) wrote:
Hi Robert,
Thanks for your review. Please see inline
-Original Message-
From: Robert Sparks
Date: Thursday, 5 January 2017 at 4:05 AM
To: "gen-art@ietf.org"
Cc:
Hi Robert,
Thanks for your review. Please see inline
>-Original Message-
>From: Robert Sparks
>Date: Thursday, 5 January 2017 at 4:05 AM
>To: "gen-art@ietf.org"
>Cc: "draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket@ietf.org"
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For