Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04

Dale: Many thanks for this review, which indeed was exceptionally useful. (“Super” as Charlie put it.) I have placed a no-objection position for this document for tonight’s IESG telechat. But I think your discussion on the details of changes inspired by Dale’s review probably needs to

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04

Charlie Perkins writes: > > Are there any other types "in common use"? > > I will add some text according to your suggestion. My criterion for > whether the identifier type was included in the document was whether or > not anyone had asked for it to be included.

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04

Hello Dale, Thanks for the thorough review. My follow-up comments are inline below. On 1/31/2017 11:34 AM, Dale Worley wrote: 1. The Introduction states Other types of identifiers are in common use, and even referenced in RFC 4283. For the reader's sanity, some sort of accounting

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04

Reviewer: Dale Worley Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For