Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-taps-transports-11

2016-12-01 Thread Jari Arkko
Thanks for the review, Robert. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-siprec-callflows-07

2016-12-01 Thread Jari Arkko
Thank you very much for your review, Dan. Authors, have you taken a look at Dan’s comments? Jari On 25 Nov 2016, at 14:16, Dan Romascanu wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-bbf-bbf-urn-02

2016-12-01 Thread Jari Arkko
Thanks for the review & the edits. jari On 24 Nov 2016, at 02:24, Joel Halpern wrote: > The new version addresses my concerns and is ready for publication as an > informational RFC. > > Yours, > Joel M. Halpern > > On 10/14/16 4:51 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: >> I am

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-siprec-callflows-07

2016-12-01 Thread Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
Hi Jari, Yes. I just replied to Dan’s comment. Will take care of all of them. Thanks for your review. Regards, Ram -Original Message- From: Jari Arkko Date: Thursday, 1 December 2016 at 7:08 PM To: Dan Romascanu Cc: ,

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-6lo-privacy-considerations-04

2016-12-01 Thread Jari Arkko
Paul: thank you for the review! Jari On 28 Nov 2016, at 20:09, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the > IETF Chair. Please treat

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon-12

2016-12-01 Thread Jari Arkko
Thanks for the review and fixes! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-siprec-callflows-07

2016-12-01 Thread Dan Romascanu
Hi Ran, Thanks for addressing all my concerns and congratulations to you and your colleagues for the good work. Regards, Dan On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Ram Mohan R (rmohanr) wrote: > Hi Dan, > > Thanks for your review. Please see inline > > From: Dan Romascanu

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-siprec-callflows-07

2016-12-01 Thread Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
Hi Dan, Thanks for your review. Please see inline From: Dan Romascanu Date: Friday, 25 November 2016 at 5:46 PM To: "gen-art@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-siprec-callflows@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Gen-ART

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ieee-urn-03

2016-12-01 Thread IETF Secretariat
Reviewer: Pete Resnick Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pim-join-attributes-for-lisp-05

2016-12-01 Thread Jari Arkko
Lucy, Many thanks for your review. Dino, Stig, does this discussion lead you to consider adding some clarifications to the document? I am not going to require those (just posted a no-obj for the document on today’s telechat), but wanted to give you an opportunity to consider that. Jari

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-kitten-pkinit-freshness-07

2016-12-01 Thread Michiko Short
Ok, since answer not obvious starting thread on Kitten. -Original Message- From: Jari Arkko [mailto:jari.ar...@piuha.net] Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2016 1:30 AM To: Benjamin Kaduk Cc: Paul Miller (NT) ; Michiko Short ;

[Gen-art] QRE: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-kitten-pkinit-freshness-07

2016-12-01 Thread Michiko Short
One thing to note, since the client will never know what the KDC is using size will not impact the error or AS-REQ processing unless we can declare a universal min and max. It can be used by the KDC since it will know if nonce, sym crypto or asym crypto. So the example that Russ provided was

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pim-join-attributes-for-lisp-05

2016-12-01 Thread Dino Farinacci
> OK, forget my suggestion. I have a difficulty to parse this sentence (second > part) > > It determines the downstream destination for unicast head-end replication > and identifies the > receiver ETR that needs to be notified should the root of the > distribution tree move to another site.

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pim-join-attributes-for-lisp-05

2016-12-01 Thread Jari Arkko
That would work for me. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pim-join-attributes-for-lisp-05

2016-12-01 Thread Dino Farinacci
> Lucy, > > Many thanks for your review. > > Dino, Stig, does this discussion lead you to consider adding some > clarifications to the document? I am not going to require those (just posted > a no-obj for the document on today’s telechat), but wanted to give you an > opportunity to consider

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pim-join-attributes-for-lisp-05

2016-12-01 Thread Lucy yong
OK, forget my suggestion. I have a difficulty to parse this sentence (second part) It determines the downstream destination for unicast head-end replication and identifies the receiver ETR that needs to be notified should the root of the distribution tree move to another site. Lucy

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pim-join-attributes-for-lisp-05

2016-12-01 Thread Lucy yong
Thank you, Dino. Good, I understand it now. Lucy -Original Message- From: Dino Farinacci [mailto:farina...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2016 1:53 PM To: Lucy yong Cc: Jari Arkko; draft-ietf-pim-join-attributes-for-l...@tools.ietf.org; General Area Review Team; Stig Venaas

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pim-join-attributes-for-lisp-05

2016-12-01 Thread Dino Farinacci
> Could you make this sentence more readable? > > It determines the downstream destination for unicast head-end replication > and identifies the > receiver ETR that needs to be notified should the root of the > distribution tree move to another site. > > "should be", "moving”? I do not

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pim-join-attributes-for-lisp-05

2016-12-01 Thread Dino Farinacci
There is no other text in the email. So can’t be sure what you are saying. I’m guessing you are fine with the proposed text? My co-authors have to agree though. ;-) Dino > On Dec 1, 2016, at 11:55 AM, Jari Arkko wrote: > > That would work for me. > > Jari >

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pim-join-attributes-for-lisp-05

2016-12-01 Thread Lucy yong
Hi Dino, Sorry, I did not have time to study RFC6831 for this review work and may not interpret the draft properly by reading it. I trust you on the protocol design and have no objection on Jari's decision. Could you make this sentence more readable? It determines the downstream

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pim-join-attributes-for-lisp-05

2016-12-01 Thread Jari Arkko
On 01 Dec 2016, at 22:01, Dino Farinacci wrote: > There is no other text in the email. So can’t be sure what you are saying. > I’m guessing you are fine with the proposed text? yes, the one that you proposed signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using

[Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 2016-12-01

2016-12-01 Thread A. Jean Mahoney
Hi all, NOTE: This email contains links to the new review tool functionality in Datatracker. The old review tool (art.tools.ietf.org/tools/art/genart/) is now deprecated, use Datatracker instead. The following reviewers have assignments: Reviewer LC end Draft

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-straw-b2bua-rtcp-15

2016-12-01 Thread Jari Arkko
Many thanks for your excellent review, Russ. I plan to watch the resolution of the Discusses related to the unclear SHOULD NOT. (It certainly would have been a Discuss from me if a Discuss wasn’t already raised.) At this point I do not plan to block on the document class, but looking forward

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-kitten-pkinit-freshness-07

2016-12-01 Thread Jari Arkko
Many thanks for your review, Russ, and for thinking about this space and what issues there might be. I too am concerned about the issue that Russ Housley raised: bad practices in creating the freshness tokens creates a security issue. If this cannot be handled in the way that Russ initially

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-behave-ipfix-nat-logging-11

2016-12-01 Thread Jari Arkko
Thanks much for your review, Paul! Do the authors have any comments? Paul’s review comments should be addressed. I think that at least the Section 5.6 question is something that you must address. Jari On 28 Nov 2016, at 19:06, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > I am the assigned

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming-09

2016-12-01 Thread Jari Arkko
Thanks for your review, Joel! Jari On 31 Oct 2016, at 00:47, Joel M. Halpern wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art Telechat review: draft-ietf-kitten-rfc6112bis-03

2016-12-01 Thread Jari Arkko
Thanks for your review, Robert, and thanks everyone for addressing the earlier comments. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-leiba-3967upd-downref-00

2016-12-01 Thread Jari Arkko
Thanks again for your reviews on this and other documents, Peter! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art