Hi Dale,
Thank you for your review, I appreciate it. Please see inline.
At 6:32 PM -0800 2/17/17, Dale Worley wrote:
Reviewer: Dale Worley
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents
I am almost done with my reply. I wasn't ignoring Dale, I've been
working on his comments.
At 11:28 PM + 2/21/17, Natasha Rooney wrote:
Hi Dale! Many thanks for these comments, as one of the SLIM chairs
I'll work on getting some answers to you or I'll request the author
or one of the
Jouni,
Here is the thread for your second major comment:
Major comment #2 from you:
>2) The PDM option relation to actual "server" time is somewhat confusing and
>the 5-tuple does not allow me to detect the real relationship between the
>>server/application action that caused the generation
I don't know why this email keeps getting cut off!
I am attaching my response in a text file.
Sigh. Thanks,
Nalini ElkinsInside Products, Inc.www.insidethestack.com(831) 659-8360
- Forwarded Message -
From: "nalini.elk...@insidethestack.com"
To:
Hi Christer,
Version -05 of the draft, which was just posted, is intended to resolve
your comments.
Thanks,
Donald
===
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
d3e...@gmail.com
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 7:47 AM,
Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
Francis,
Thanks for the careful review. Can you suggest a better title?
Ron
P.S. I have worked the other comments into the next version of the draft.
> -Original Message-
> From: Gen-art [mailto:gen-art-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Cerveny, Bill