Dear Roni,
Thank you for your review. Indeed, you raised a crucial privacy issue that
we need to tackle in this draft.
If we look at https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8065 which recommends the
generic https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8064, we can say that we comply by
inheritance from Ethernet since
No problem, understood, and many thanks!
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
El 5/7/19 5:21, "Warren Kumari" escribió:
On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 6:52 AM Jordi Palet Martínez
wrote:
>
> Hi Meral,
>
>
>
> I just realized, if I understood correctly, that from GENART the
Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
On 5 Jul 2019, at 10:00, Fred Baker wrote:
In Section 2.1 and 2.2, Instead of "set to one" and "set to zero", it
would
read easier with "set to (1)" and "set to (0)", or some similar
construction.
That seems to me to be stylistic - I'm not at all sure what makes
"(1)" more readable than
