I was selected as General Area Review Team reviewer for this specification
(for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Document: draft-ietf-simple-presence-data-model-06
Intended Status: Proposed Standard
Shepherding AD: Ted Hardie
Review
I was selected as General Area Review Team reviewer for this specification
(for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Document: draft-ietf-l3vpn-vr-mib-04.txt
Intended Status: Proposed Standard
Shepherding AD: Mark Townsley
Review Trigger:
Correction (Cut and paste error): This doc is intended for Info not PS.
I was selected as General Area Review Team reviewer for this specification
(for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Document: draft-ietf-sipping-consent-reqs-03.txt
I was selected as General Area Review Team reviewer for this specification
(for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Document: draft-bberry-pppoe-credit-04.txt
Intended Status: Informational (Individual submission via RFC Editor)
Shepherding
I was selected as General Area Review Team reviewer for this specification
(for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Document: draft-bberry-pppoe-credit-04.txt
Intended Status: Informational (Individual submission via RFC Editor)
Shepherding
I was selected as General Area Review Team reviewer for this specification
(for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Document: draft-zeilenga-ldap-ext-09.txt
Intended Status: BCP (Individual Submission)
Shepherding AD: Ted Hardie
Review
I was selected as General Area Review Team reviewer for this specification
(for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Document: draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-bgp-06.txt
Intended Status: Proposed Standard
Shepherding AD: Mark Townsley
Review Trigger:
I was selected as General Area Review Team reviewer for this specification
(for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Document: draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-08.txt
Intended Status: Proposed Standard
Shepherding AD: Mark Townsley
Review Trigger:
I was just clearing up my mailbox and came across stuff about this draft.
I just reviewed the mobike protocol (draft-ietf-mobike-protocol-07.txt)
which has some related aims... I suspect (but haven't thought very hard
about it) that mobike and this are closely related in terms of
revalidation.
: Elwyn Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 5:00 PM
To: Joel M. Halpern
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] IETF LC review: draft-nir-ikev2-auth-lt-04.txt
I was just clearing up my mailbox and came across stuff about
I was selected as General Area Review Team reviewer for this specification
(for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Document: draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-08.txt
Intended Status: Proposed Standard (Individual submission via AD)
Shepherding
I was selected as General Area Review Team reviewer for this specification
(for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Document: draft-ietf-l2tpext-l2vpn-06.txt
Intended Status: Proposed Standard (WG submission)
Shepherding AD: Mark Townsley
I was selected as General Area Review Team reviewer for this specification
(for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Document: draft-ietf-cat-kerberos-pk-init-33.txt
Intended Status: Proposed Standard ((Long Defunct) WG submission)
I was selected as General Area Review Team reviewer for this specification
(for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Document: draft-ietf-krb-wg-ocsp-for-pkinit-06.txt
Intended Status: Proposed Standard (WG submission)
Shepherding AD: Sam
Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 12:26:59AM +, Elwyn Davies wrote:
I was selected as General Area Review Team reviewer for this specification
(for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Document: draft-ietf-krb-wg-ocsp
I was selected as General Area Review Team reviewer for this specification
(for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Document: draft-ietf-ipsec-ike-auth-ecdsa-05.txt
Intended Status: Proposed Standard (WG submission)
Shepherding AD: Russ
...
Regards,
Elwyn
Sam Hartman wrote:
Elwyn == Elwyn Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Elwyn Well, I fear I may be going to provoke another version,
Elwyn because although it is IMO almost ready for PS, the IANA
Elwyn considerations need some attention.
But as you
Background for those on the CC list, who may be unaware of GenART:
GenART is the Area Review Team for the General Area of the IETF. We
advise the General Area Director (i.e. the IETF/IESG chair) by providing
more in depth reviews than he could do himself of documents that come up
for final
I was selected as General Area Review Team reviewer for this specification
(for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Document: draft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-01.txt
Intended Status: Experimental (RFC3933 Process Experiment)
Shepherding
Hi.
Sam Hartman wrote:
I am happy to make a change similar to the one you propose in section
1.
I'm happy to split the parts of section 4 dealing with what the IESG
might do into their own section as an example.
That's fine by me.. it should make a self-consistent document.
I do not want
Regarding draft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-01:
I have reviewed -01 for LC. Sam and I have exchanged mails on this and
I understood he was going to create a new version, which I assumed would
be going to the IESG.
Regards,
Elwyn
Mary Barnes wrote:
Here's the assignments for the March
all your
suggestions correctly, but I understand if you don't have time to do
this.
Elwyn Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was selected as General Area Review Team reviewer for this specification
(for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html
This is ready to go as PS modulo checking that the various copyright
statements and permissions don't interact badly (there is the overall
IETF statement, separate copyright statements on the code in s11 and a
statement of permissions and copyright by the author in s15). The
issues I raised
responses are inline:
Stephen
-Original Message-
From: Elwyn Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 12:43 PM
To: General Area Review Team
Cc: Mary Barnes; Allison Mankin; Stephen Hayes (TX/EUS)
Subject: Gen-art review of draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt
I am the assigned Gen
This one looks good to go for Informational. The various editorial
comments from my last call review have been fixed. The fairly extensive
edits since then do not appear to have introduced any new issues.
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
be a revision coming, at which point I trust the authors
will review Sharon's comments.
Brian
Elwyn Davies wrote:
Sharon Chisholm wrote:
Attached is my review of the specified document, submitted as part of
the Gen-ART process. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for
draft-ietf-ltru-matching-15.txt.
For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html.
This set of comments should have reached you during IETF Last Call but
due to holidays I didn't receive the
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for
draft-clancy-eap-pax-08.txt. For background on Gen-ART, please see the
FAQ at
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html.
Please consider these comments along with any other last call comments
you may receive.
Summary
===
This document
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for
draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-restart-ext-05.txt. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html.
Please consider these comments along with any other last call comments
you may receive.
Summary
===
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these (slightly belated - sorry) comments along with any
other Last Call comments you may
Hi.
Thanks for the quick response.
A few comments inline.
/Elwyn
Carl Wallace wrote:
Responses inline throughout prefaced by [CRW].
-Original Message-
From: Elwyn Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:52 AM
To: General Area Review Team
Cc: Mary
-sipping-poc-p-answer-state-header-04.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 30 November 2006
IETF LC End Date: 6 December 2006
Summary:
This document must hold some sort of record for long titles! (Maybe
omitting the abbreviation(s) from the title would keep it down to just
two lines
-ipsec-rfc4305-bis-errata-02.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 12 December 2006
IETF LC End Date: 4 January 2007
IESG Telechat date: (if known) -
Summary:
My comments are significantly longer than the actual changes made to
this document since RFC 4305. Doh!
The document states
.
Document: draft-manral-ipsec-rfc4305-bis-errata-03
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 19 Jan 2007
IESG Telechat date: 25 January 2007
Summary:
This document is ready for ps. My LC comments on -02 have all been
resolved.
Comments:
___
Gen-art mailing list
.
Document: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-restart-ext-07
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 19 jan 207
IESG Telechat date: 25 January 2007
Summary:
This is probably ready for PS. My main points from the LC review have
been resolved satisfactorily. There was one point which the authors
claimed was addressed
.
Document: draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-18.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 05/03/2007
IESG Telechat date: 8 March 2007
Summary:
All my significant issues with -17 have been fixed in -18, and I believe this is
ready to go for PS.
There are a couple of residual consistency points that can
-fec-bb-revised-06.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 11 April 2007
IETF LC End Date: 12 April 2007
IESG Telechat date: (if known) -
Summary:
Almost ready for PS. There are some minor issues and editorial nits that
should be addressed before it goes to the IESG.
Comments:
Minor Issues:
s6
)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-rmt-fec-bb-revised-06.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 11 April 2007
I am fine with all these proposals/discussions.
Regards,
Elwyn
Mark Watson wrote:
Elwyn,
Thanks for the detailed review. Comments below...
Others on cc: There are some suggestions below that need your review.
...Mark
On 4/10/07 5:25 PM, Elwyn Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have
This revision addresses the nits I identified at LC and is ready to go
for PS.
Thanks
/Elwyn
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
-sieve-body-06.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 21 June 2007
IETF LC End Date: 13 June 2007
IESG Telechat date: (if known) -
Summary:
Ready for the IESG. There are a couple of minor nits that
can be fixed by the RFc Editor.
Aside: This is almost certainly irrelevant to this document but has
-ipv6-deprecate-rh0-01.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 21/9/07
IETF LC End Date: 20/9/07
IESG Telechat date: (if known) -
Summary: This document is almost ready for the IESG. I have a couple of
essentially editorial comments below.
Comments:
s3: IPv6 nodes **MUST NOT process** RH0
: draft-ietf-crisp-iris-dchk-07.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 12 October 2007
IESG Telechat date: 18 October 2007
Summary: The two major points from the gen-art last call review have been
cleared up in this version. One minor issue remains and the editorial comments
from the previous
: draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-07
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 26 October 2007
IESG Telechat date: 1 November 2007
Summary:
Many of the items noted in my last call review have been fixed. However, and I
am sorry to harp on about this, I believe that many of the instances
-l2vpn-vpls-bridge-interop-02.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 19 November 2007
IETF LC End Date: 9 November 2007
Summary:
If I understand correctly, this document 'standardizes' the RFC 4464 s2.2
bridge model selection (it chooses #2) and bridge module functionality that
will ensure a VPLS
: draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-rs-05.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 23 November 2007
IESG Telechat date: 29 November 2007
Summary:
Ready for Proposed Standard. There are a few editorial nits to feed to the RFC
Editor.
Caveat: I am not skilled in the FEC art and although I have enough maths
-multidomain-pki-11.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 28 December 2007
IETF LC End Date: 1 January 2008
IESG Telechat date: (if known) -
Summary:
In general this is a well written and, as far as I can see, comprehensive
document. I have one major problem with it: it far exceeds the scope
-netlmm-proxymip6-10.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 18 Feb 2008
IETF LC End Date: 20 Feb 2008
IESG Telechat date: 21 Feb 2008
Summary:
This document is well written and is in fairly good shape for submission
to the IESG.
There are a number of minor issues which ought to be fixed. I think
: draft-ietf-netlmm-proxymip6-11.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 29 Feb 2008
IESG Telechat date: 06 March 2008
Summary:
Version 11 resolves almost all of the issues and nits that I raised in the last
call review of version 10. There is one editorial matter to complete the 'ease
-smime-multisig-04.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 7 March 2008
IETF LC End Date: 7 March 2008
IESG Telechat date: (if known)
Summary:
Mostly fine except for a piece of unclear specification noted below and
a few editorial nits.
Caveat: I am not a security expert and this should not be taken
-rohc-rfc3095bis-rohcv2-profiles-05
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 7 March 2008
IETF LC End Date: 20 March 2008
IESG Telechat date: (if known)
Summary:
The document is almost ready for the IESG. There are a couple of minor
issues that ought to be resolved as detailed below (especially
Sri Gundavelli wrote:
Hi Elwyn,
Sorry for the late reply. Thanks for reviewing the updated
draft. We will address the two remaining issues. Please
see inline.
No problem.. I am stuck in a hotel in Toronto, nit getting to IETF. :-(((
Snipped the first issue as that should be fine.
-pim-join-attributes-03.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 15 March 2008
IETF LC End Date: 26 March 2008
IESG Telechat date: (if known) -
Summary:
This document appears to be seriously unready, although, as ever, some
of the apparent problems may be due to my misunderstandings. From
satisfaction as well as, if possible, a quick resolution.
Best regards,
The authors,
Ghyslain Pelletier
Kristofer Sandlund
Original Message
From: Elwyn Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 7 mars 2008 19:55
Document: draft-ietf-rohc-rfc3095bis-rohcv2-profiles-05
-rserpool-policies-08.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 11 April 2008
IETF LC End Date: 14 April 2008
IESG Telechat date: (if known) -
Summary:
Sorry, guys! This document is not in good shape. I know it is, in a
sense, the bottom of the tree and somebody reading it would probably be
expected
-rmt-bb-norm-revised-04.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 15 April 2008
IETF LC End Date: 17 April 2008
IESG Telechat date: (if known)
Summary:
A well-written document covering some pretty complex ideas. Technically
ready for the IESG but a little up front explanation for the naive
reader
-rmt-bb-fec-basic-schemes-revised-05.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 18 July 2008
IETF LC End Date: 29 July 2008
IESG Telechat date: n/a
Summary:
Nearly ready for IESG. A few minor issues mainly with failure to
specify encodings and a couple of corner cases. A few editorial nits
noted
This is a Gen-art review of draft-ietf-manet-packetbb-14.txt. The document has been extensively edited
since IESG review and it seemed appropriate to give it a complete review.
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 9 August 2008
Summary:
This document is a tremendous improvement on -11 which I
-forces-model-14.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 5 Setember 2008
IETF LC End Date: 8 September 2008
IESG Telechat date: (if known) -
Summary: Nearly ready for IESG. Generally this is a very well
constructed and written document dealing with a very complex problem.
There are quite a number
I had a look through Joel's responses which seemed to be pretty much
sensible (although I think changing 'target' for 'anchor' wouldn't be a
big deal - but I won't make a big deal about this). If Joel want to
send me a pre-release I would be happy to do a quick check later today,
but I can't
: draft-ietf-manet-packetbb-15.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 20 September 2008
IESG Telechat date: 25 Sept. 2008
Summary:
This document is ready for PS except for one hideous error:
My name is misspelt in the acknowledgements: s/Davis/Davies/
Thanks to the authors for all the work
: draft-ietf-forces-model-15.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 20 September 2008
IESG Telechat date: 25 Sept. 2008
Summary:
This document is ready for PS.
One rather glaring editorial nit - the version number in the file name in the
page 1 header block is still 14 (surprised the submission
in March 2008.
Document: draft-ietf-pim-join-attributes-05.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 1 October 2008
IESG Telechat date: (if known) -
Summary:
The document is now targeted at standards track instead of informational which
looks correct to me. I guess it should be considered as updating RFC
-sip-media-security-requirements-07.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 10 October 2008
IETF LC End Date: 13 October 2008
IESG Telechat date: (if known) -
Summary:
This document is almost ready for the IESG. I have a couple of comments
and queries about the reasoning in a few
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
_http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html_).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document:
these in the -06 draft is below.
Regards,
Mark
On 7/18/08 8:57 AM, Elwyn Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
_http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html_).
Please
-monami6-multiplecoa-10.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 24 November 2008
IETF LC End Date: 17 November 2008
IESG Telechat date: (if known) -
Summary:
This document is almost ready for the IESG. It has a number of minor
issues plus a fair number of editorial nits.
I am sending the editirial
-smime-3850bis-08.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 25 Nov 2008
IETF LC End Date: 13 Nov 2008
IESG Telechat date: (if known) -
Summary:
This document is ready for the IESG give or take a few minor editorial
nits and the posible requirement for longer key support.
Caveat: I do not have a really
: draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-basic-schemes-revised-06.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 5 Deember 2008
IESG Telechat date: 11 Dec 2008
Summary:
Ready for PS. This document addressed all the items form my last call review -
thanks.
Nits/editorial comments:
s9, para 2: In the added sentence: S/ces
I guess I can take this one. My other last call one doesn't look very
arduous.
/Elwyn
Scott Brim wrote:
If someone wants to take this one:
Reviewer: Scott Brim
- 'Home Automation Routing Requirements in Low Power and Lossy Networks '
draft-ietf-roll-home-routing-reqs-06.txt as an
-idr-rfc3392bis-02.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 12 December 2008
IETF LC End Date: 25/12/2008
IESG Telechat date: (if known) -
Summary:
The document is almost ready for the IESG. However after diligent
searching both in the RFCs and on the IANA web site, I believe that
neither
John G. Scudder wrote:
Thanks for the review. A few comments and replies in line below.
..and responses also.. Thanks for the fast turnaround.
On Dec 12, 2008, at 2:24 PM, Elwyn Davies wrote:
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft
-roll-home-routing-reqs-06.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 22 December 2008
IETF LC End Date: 25 December 2008
IESG Telechat date: (if known) -
Summary: Almost ready for informational status. I think a discussion of
reliability may be needed, and there are a couple of nits.
Comments:
Abstract
-monami6-multiplecoa-11.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 19 January 2009
IETF LC End Date: -
IESG Telechat date: (if known) -
Summary:
Most of the issues in the review of -10 have been resolved by this version.
However, a couple of new issues have been introduced by the revisions.
Comments
-pkix-rfc4055-update-01.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 19 January 2009
IETF LC End Date: 19 January 2009
IESG Telechat date: (if known) -
Summary:
Ready for the IESG.
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo
.
Document: draft-stjohns-sipso-06.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 28 January 2009
IESG Telechat date: 29 Jan 2009
Summary:
Almost ready. There are a couple of issues that need discussion - the
authors have requested IESG input on the IANA considerations.
Most of the issues in my review of -05
-connection-latching-08.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 24 February 2009
IETF LC End Date: 24 February 2009
IESG Telechat date: 26 February 2009
Summary:
Not ready. I don't have any problems with the latching concept and how
it is set out here. I think the major concern is that the draft
Just a note to say that I submitted the LC review of
draft-ietf-btns-connection-latching-08.txt
at the last minute yesterday.
/Elwyn
Mary Barnes wrote:
I've uploaded the reviews received to date along with the updated
spreadsheets. Let me know if there are any errors or omissions.
Thanks,
this review done.
Best regards,
David
On Apr 2, 2009, at 6:14 AM, 윤석웅 wrote:
Dear David Mcgrew and Elwyn Davies.
Thanks for your lots of comments during AD last call.
I really appreciated it.
Here is the revised draft to reflect whole your comments.
Please check if thers is any
Alexey Melnikov wrote:
Elwyn Davies wrote:
Hi Neil.
Sorry for the long delay in replying.
I suggest you check with your shepherding AD to discuss an approriate
registration contact point. You are probably right to use your
personal address.
Elwyn/Neil,
There was a similar issue
-mipshop-mos-dns-discovery-06
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: Jun 17, 2009
IETF LC End Date: 25 may 2009
IESG Telechat date: (if known) -
Summary: This draft is almost ready for consideration by the IESG,
always provided that the IETF community is happy with additional load that
a mobility
-sipping-service-identification-03.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 10 July 2009
IETF LC End Date: 22 July 2009
IESG Telechat date: (if known) -
Summary:
It seems that a sub-title of this document could be SIP Declarative Service Identification consodered harmful. Generally the document
-mpls-3209-patherr-05.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 3 September 2009
IETF LC End Date: 31 August 2009
IESG Telechat date: 10 September 2009
Summary:
Nearly ready. I have no problems with the statements in the document.
However I think it would be helpful to be more precise about
: draft-ietf-rohc-ipsec-extensions-hcoipsec-05
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 24 September 2009 (Apologies for slightly late review)
Summary: Almost ready. There should probably be a formal ASN.1 description
of the additional fields in the 'Processing' component of the SPD as well
.
Document: draft-ietf-roll-home-routing-reqs-08
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 6/10/2009
IESG Telechat date: 8 October 2009
Summary: Ready, in itself. My direct comments from LC have been
addressed. I am still concerned that it may be difficult to draw the
aeveral different sets of ROLL
Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
Hi Elwyn,
thanks for your review. Answers inline:
Elwyn Davies wrote:
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
_http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html_).
Please
Ertekin, Emre [USA] wrote:
Hi Elwyn,
Thank you for taking the time to review and comment on our draft; sorry for our
late reply. Please see our responses below.
Summary: Almost ready. There should probably be a formal ASN.1
description
of the additional fields in the 'Processing'
Hi.
This seems good to me. One minor point on the ASN.1: I think the extra
'rohc' piece should it be specified as 'OPTIONAL' so that not it doesn't
have to be in every implementation - and should it come after the tunnel
params as this change will alter the OID of tunnel params as it stands
(if
: Elwyn Davies [mailto:elw...@dial.pipex.com]
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 3:08 AM
To: Ertekin, Emre [USA]
Cc: General Area Reviwing Team; Mary Barnes; rohc-...@tools.ietf.org;
rohc-cha...@tools.ietf.org; c...@tzi.org; Christou, Christos [USA]
Subject: Re: Gen-art reiew of draft-ietf-rohc-ipsec
://www.iana.org/assignments/ikev2-parameters].
R,
Emre
-Original Message-
From: Elwyn Davies [mailto:elw...@dial.pipex.com]
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 11:31 AM
To: Ertekin, Emre [USA]
Cc: General Area Reviwing Team; Mary Barnes; rohc-...@tools.ietf.org;
rohc-cha...@tools.ietf.org; c
.
Document: draft-rohc-ipsec-extensions-hcoipsec-o6.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 11 December 2009
IESG Telechat date: 17 Dec 2009
Summary: Ready with the possible exception of two points.
- This document could be considered to be an update of RFC 4301 in that
it defines optional extensions
-capwap-802dot11-mib-05.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 12 December 2009
IETF LC End Date: 7 December 2009
IESG Telechat date: (if known)=
Summary: Ready for the IESG. There are a few editorial nits noted below
(the example IP addresses need to be fixed).
Major issues: -
Minor issues
.
[Editors] Yes, BSS is ok. According to my comments to the s3, it requires
more
discussion.
Regards
Richard
-邮件原件-
发件人: Elwyn Davies [mailto:elw...@dial.pipex.com]
发送时间: 2009年12月13日 6:57
收件人: General Area Reviwing Team
抄送: Mary Barnes; capwap-...@tools.ietf.org; capwap-cha
the value of both the
WLAN Profile Interfaces' and the WLAN BSS Interfaces' ifIndexes in the
ifTable
at AC reboot.
Does that work? If not leave them as they are.
Regards,
Elwyn
Regards
Richard
-邮件原件-
发件人: Elwyn Davies [mailto:elw...@dial.pipex.com]
发送时间: 2009年12月15日 3:44
收件人
that this document has now been scheduled
for this week's IESG meeting also. Sorry for the slightly late last
call review. Too much holidaying I fear!
Document: draft-xli-behave-ivi-05.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 4 January 2010
IETF LC End Date: 1 January 2010
IESG Telechat date: 7 January 2010
Hi.
The new version addresses all my comments for the 802dot11 mib. Thanks.
Happy New Year.
Elwyn
Bert Wijnen (IETF) wrote:
Inline
- Original Message -
*From:* young mailto:yo...@h3c.com
*To:* black_da...@emc.com mailto:black_da...@emc.com ; 'Bert
(IETF) Wijnen'
action.
Thanks.
xing
Elwyn Davies 写道:
Xing Li wrote:
Hi, Elwyn,
Thank you very much for your review, the comments and corrections.
We will make the corrections and try to upload the new version
tomorrow.
Since this draft is on the IESG agenda for this week you should
check with Jari Arkko
: draft-ietf-capwap-802dot11-mib-06
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 30 January 2010
IESG Telechat date: 4 Feb 2010
Summary:
Ready for IESG. -06 has fixed the issues I identified in v05. Thanks.
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https
Just to note I turned in a review of
draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-vendor-message-01 on 5 Feb.
/Elwyn
Mary Barnes wrote:
Hi all,
Here's the link to the summary of assignments for the Feb 18, 2010 telechat:
http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/reviewers-100218.html
With the updated
shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Document: draft-allbery-afs-srv-records-04
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 19 February 2010
IESG Telechat date: 18 Feb 2010
Summary: Ready other than as noted by IESG (I noted the various discuss points
and they aren't repeated here
1 - 100 of 442 matches
Mail list logo
