Hi Ignas,
Thanks a lot for the suggestion.
The authors will work together to resolve the comments received and provide
further clarification on the operational aspects.
Also we will try to collect more feedbacks from the operator communities and
incorporate them into the next revision.
Some o
Hi Joel,
Thanks a lot for your comments and discussion.
There may be some misunderstanding about the description of the targeted use
cases of this draft, in next revision more texts will be added to clarify this.
We will also try to resolve the other comments you raised.
Just some clarifica
Dear authors of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community document,
This document is a WG document, and you have received community feedback
on it stating that there are unclear aspects and questionable approaches
described in it. Please address the comments to have the document cover
the concerns
I am having trouble reconciling two of your comments.
In you rlast email you said that this is for "planed communities
represent the groups of customers peers an geographical and topological
related information". Planned communities is presumably a new behavior,
not existing behavior.
In thi
Is this for one operator (still important, but not necessarily for
standardization) or are there several operators who have expressed
interest in this?
Yes, we do proactive standards. But the IDR group, for example, tends
to be very careful to see if interest is reflected in implementation.
This was a requested early review. You folks can do as you deem best.
From where I sit, it seems odd. Most well-known communities do not fit
the pattern of representing groups of sources or groups of destinations.
I presume the intent here is for this to be useful in some AS other than
the on
Hi Joel,
Thanks for your review comments. Please see my replies inline:
> -Original Message-
> From: Joel Halpern [mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com]
> Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2018 1:27 AM
> To: gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community@ietf.org; ops...@ietf.org
>
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review result: Not Ready
This is an early gen-art review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-04.
The document is clear about what it is trying to do, and readable. It is not
clear about how it expects this to actually work.
However, I find the underlying concept confusing.
1)
