Re: [Gen-art] [dnssd] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-push-20

On Jul 4, 2019, at 4:09 PM, Tom Pusateri wrote: > I’m ok with removing resolver support for now to simplify this and tackle > resolvers in another document. But if there’s a good solution we’re all happy > with, we can fix it now. I think we’ve specified the parts of resolver support that we

Re: [Gen-art] [dnssd] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-push-20

Maybe we could have a conference call and hash this out. Anyone is welcome. I’m ok with removing resolver support for now to simplify this and tackle resolvers in another document. But if there’s a good solution we’re all happy with, we can fix it now. Tom > On Jul 4, 2019, at 3:54 PM, Ted

Re: [Gen-art] [dnssd] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-push-20

On Jul 4, 2019, at 3:32 PM, Tom Pusateri wrote: > I was trying to give the client enough information to determine WHY it > failed. If we determine this isn’t important, we can just let the client try > to figure it out but it will be more work for the client. The client is a computer program,

Re: [Gen-art] [dnssd] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-push-20

> On Jul 4, 2019, at 2:13 PM, Ted Lemon wrote: > > On Jul 4, 2019, at 12:52 PM, Tom Pusateri > wrote: >> 1. The client should only send SUBSCRIBE to set up the DSO session if it has >> gone through the discovery process and wants to talk to the authoritative >>

Re: [Gen-art] [dnssd] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-push-20

On Jul 4, 2019, at 12:52 PM, Tom Pusateri wrote: > 1. The client should only send SUBSCRIBE to set up the DSO session if it has > gone through the discovery process and wants to talk to the authoritative > directly. If it wants to try to subscribe to push notifications through a > resolver,

Re: [Gen-art] [dnssd] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-push-20

> On Jul 3, 2019, at 11:12 AM, Ted Lemon wrote: > > On Jul 3, 2019, at 10:45 AM, Robert Sparks > wrote: >> And I think that's a problem. >> >> What does a NOTIMP mean to the client? Most of the draft says "The server >> doesn't implement DSO". It doesn't say

Re: [Gen-art] [dnssd] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-push-20

inline On 7/2/19 1:36 PM, Tom Pusateri wrote: On Jun 28, 2019, at 4:03 PM, Robert Sparks via Datatracker wrote: Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents

Re: [Gen-art] [dnssd] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-push-20

> On Jun 28, 2019, at 4:03 PM, Robert Sparks via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review result: Ready with Issues > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for