Thank you Janos. I have looked at the changes. They address my
concerns, and make a number of other useful and consistent changes that
improve the document readability and clarity.
Yours,
Joel
On 2/6/19 5:17 PM, János Farkas wrote:
Hi Joel,
Thank you very much again for your review!
The
Thanks Janos. I will take a look at it promptly.
Yours,
Joel
On 2/6/19 5:17 PM, János Farkas wrote:
Hi Joel,
Thank you very much again for your review!
The draft had multiple updates since v08 you reviewed. The latest
revision is v 11:
Hi Pascal,
Thank you for your comment!
There was another comment pointing out that the text I suggested is
misleading.
Instead, I suggest the following update:
OLD:
In general, a trivial priority-based queuing scheme will give better
average latency to a data flow than DetNet, but of
Hello János
I's change reasonably to strictly.
The whole point of bounded in detnet is that it is not a vague boundary but a
hard, guaranteed one, regardless of any other activity in the network.
All the best,
Pascal
> -Original Message-
> From: János Farkas
> Sent: vendredi 19
Joel,
Please see in-line.
On 10/19/2018 9:17 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
Thank you Janos. Two clarifications under retained text, with the
rest elided.
Yours,
Joel
On 10/19/18 3:10 PM, János Farkas wrote:
...
On 9/22/2018 2:59 AM, Joel Halpern wrote:
...
Minor issues:
Section 3.1
Thank you Janos. Two clarifications under retained text, with the rest
elided.
Yours,
Joel
On 10/19/18 3:10 PM, János Farkas wrote:
...
On 9/22/2018 2:59 AM, Joel Halpern wrote:
...
Minor issues:
Section 3.1 states that worst case delay for priority queueing is
unbounded. That
Hi Joel,
Thank you very much for your review!
Please find below in-line responses and how we plan to update the draft
to resolve your comments.
Best regards,
Janos
On 9/22/2018 2:59 AM, Joel Halpern wrote:
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART
