Re: [Gendergap] [Commons-l] Fwd: Photo of the Day on Wikimedia Commons

2011-05-16 Thread Gillian White
This anime image is not appropriate on the front page. Questions of art, of education, and of publication, all require judgement. Judgement in these matters is normal and necessary and is not of itself something which needs apology. Here are some reasons why I think it is okay to decide NOT to put

Re: [Gendergap] [Commons-l] Fwd: Photo of the Day on Wikimedia Commons

2011-05-16 Thread Pete Forsyth
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Sarah Stierch wrote: > On 5/16/2011 11:49 AM, Pete Forsyth wrote: > > Anybody interested in tackling this issue? > -Pete > > I'm working on diving into the HOW-TO this summer for Wiki. I do want to > see all of these topics covered - and I'll contribute in anyway

Re: [Gendergap] Photo of the Day on Wikimedia Commons

2011-05-16 Thread Shlomi Fish
Hi all, On Monday 16 May 2011 05:03:26 Sarah Stierch wrote: > Surely I'm not the only one who noticed this lovely gem of a photo of > the day today. In my work environment - NFWS. > > http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page > > Direct link to image: > http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:O

Re: [Gendergap] [Commons-l] [Foundation-l] Commons as an art gallery?

2011-05-16 Thread Andreas Kolbe
--- On Mon, 16/5/11, Andreas Kolbe wrote: > From: Andreas Kolbe > Subject: Re: [Commons-l] [Foundation-l] Commons as an art gallery? > To: "Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List" , > "Wikimedia Commons Discussion List" , > "Increasing female participation in Wikimedia projects" > > Date: Monday,

Re: [Gendergap] [Commons-l] Fwd: Photo of the Day on Wikimedia Commons

2011-05-16 Thread Nepenthe
I was all ready to point out that administrators (at least on en.wiki, theoretically) discount comments like that, but that was *not* done in this case per the closing summary. Nepenthe On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Sarah wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:36, Sarah Stierch wrote: > >> If

Re: [Gendergap] [Foundation-l] Commons as an art gallery?

2011-05-16 Thread Andreas Kolbe
Incidentally, that little piece of original art is also the picture of the day on several Wikipedias' main pages; among them the Russian and Bulgarian Wikipedias. The image itself has been nominated for deletion in Commons by User:AndreasPraefcke, as out of scope. A. --- On Mon, 16/5/11, Andrea

Re: [Gendergap] [Commons-l] Fwd: Photo of the Day on Wikimedia Commons

2011-05-16 Thread Sarah
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:36, Sarah Stierch wrote: > If anyone is interested in contributing to the decisions made about what > goes up on the front page of Commons, please visit here, I just found out > about this today, and I look forward to contributing: > > http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki

Re: [Gendergap] [Commons-l] Fwd: Photo of the Day on Wikimedia Commons

2011-05-16 Thread Sarah Stierch
On 5/16/2011 11:49 AM, Pete Forsyth wrote: Anybody interested in tackling this issue? -Pete As we know on this list, inclusiveness is a key to making Wikimedia what it is. I do wish that I could erase the 'your country vs. my country' ideals that are within many of these peoples heads. I'm

Re: [Gendergap] Commons as an art gallery?

2011-05-16 Thread carolmooredc
*puerile* - perfect! * A good long list makes the squeaky wheel loud and clear :-) On 5/16/2011 11:40 AM, Andreas Kolbe wrote: > There is a long thread on the Commons and Gendergap lists about today's > featured image on Commons: > > http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/commons-l/2011-May/ > http

Re: [Gendergap] [Commons-l] Fwd: Photo of the Day on Wikimedia Commons

2011-05-16 Thread Pete Forsyth
In my opinion there's a large and pervasive problem behind today's controversy: in striking contrast to our core value of openness, it is very difficult to even *perceive* how important decisions like this are made. Both the technical and the editorial processes are pretty opaque to the average

[Gendergap] Commons as an art gallery?

2011-05-16 Thread Andreas Kolbe
There is a long thread on the Commons and Gendergap lists about today's featured image on Commons: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/commons-l/2011-May/ http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-May/ It's an original piece of art by a Wikimedian, "in the style of" erotic manga: htt

Re: [Gendergap] [Commons-l] Fwd: Photo of the Day on Wikimedia Commons

2011-05-16 Thread Andreas Kolbe
--- On Mon, 16/5/11, Béria Lima wrote: From: Béria Lima Subject: Re: [Gendergap] [Commons-l] Fwd: Photo of the Day on Wikimedia Commons To: "Increasing female participation in Wikimedia projects" Date: Monday, 16 May, 2011, 14:10 That said, changed the picture without any discussion, only be

Re: [Gendergap] [Commons-l] Fwd: Photo of the Day on Wikimedia Commons

2011-05-16 Thread Béria Lima
> > *Actually, given that the template was cascade protected by virtue of it > being on the main page, only administrators can edit it. You're not an > administrator on Commons, but you do have a staff flag. Therefore I'd say > that's a staff action.* > That said, changed the picture without any

Re: [Gendergap] Photo of the Day on Wikimedia Commons

2011-05-16 Thread Thomas Koenig
Original-Nachricht > Datum: Sun, 15 May 2011 22:08:06 -0400 > From: Sarah Stierch > To: gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > Tagline: Re: [Gendergap] Photo of the Day on Wikimedia Commons > Image is more like it, not photo. A talented artist, just..not the most > welcoming image wh