Odd thing about the current Google search results for Bradley Manning.
It gives the title "Bradley Manning" with a link to the Chelsea
Manning page, which when followed is a redirect to Bradley Manning. SS
attached.
<>___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@
On 6 September 2013 11:55, Jeremy Baron wrote:
> On Sep 5, 2013 6:55 PM, "Risker" wrote:
> > Secondly, redirects are expensive - not to those in the Western world
> with fast computers and high speed internet, but to those who are on
> dial-up or have comparatively high lag times because of dist
Actually you would be surprised at the nature of some of the renaming
debates on Wikipedia in the area of artists like the one you mention,
but also artists from the 17th-century. One could probably write a
funny book about renaming debates on Wikipedia.
You could start by expanding the releva
On Sep 5, 2013 6:55 PM, "Risker" wrote:
> Secondly, redirects are expensive - not to those in the Western world
with fast computers and high speed internet, but to those who are on
dial-up or have comparatively high lag times because of distance (lots of
people at Wikimania had difficulty getting
On Sep 5, 2013, at 11:34 PM, Helga Hansen wrote:
> Since when is Wikipedia about beliefs?
The question of what policy to follow regarding article names, in general, has
no externally valid single right answer. "Cat"? "Felis Silvestrus Catus"?
"Kitties!"? "Neko"?
The default standard is
