On 6/22/2015 11:46 AM, Marie Earley wrote:
I'm not keen on the phrase female-related content, I posted this
transcript of an exchange I had with an editor
https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2015-April/005670.html
in April.
When I dared to suggest that women could be interested
://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2223860
Marie
--
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 07:57:48 -0400
From: slowki...@gmail.com
To: gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Gendergap] Slate on Wikipedia and the gendergap
empty simplistic theorizing
need to do multi-factor
Hello,
Slate recently published a, at least to my eyes, fairly well-balanced article
about Wikipedia:
http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/bitwise/2014/12/wikipedia_editing_disputes_the_crowdsourced_encyclopedia_has_become_a_rancorous.html?wpsrc=sh_all_tab_tw_bot
The Gender Gap Task
