2012/2/5 Delphine Ménard
> Also, I just realized that with SUL, the gender is not passed from one
> wiki to the other, and frankly, I doubt people revisit their
> preferences for each wiki (my account is active on 108 wikis... I'm
> never gonna change all of those !*) they do 100 edits on. Just a
Sarah Stierch, 05/02/2012 17:16:
Delphine - thanks for letting us know that they don't carry over. I
never knew that! I'll probably change mine as I travel across wiki's :)
The only "global preference" is email address (and password).
Nemo
___
Gende
On 2/5/12 11:14 AM, Delphine Ménard wrote:
I think, keeping in mind what Erik pointed out about the bias of such
a statistics, that it would be extremely interesting to be able to
compare those numbers (disclosed male or female) with non identified
gender. For all we know, females might make th
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:59 PM, emijrp wrote:
> Hi all;
>
> Is there any up-to-date statistical tools monitoring gender gap? I have
> started this basic one[1], and I'm thinking about an analysis of male-female
> biographies ratio between Wikipedias.
>
> Suggestions and links to tools are welcome
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:38 AM, emijrp wrote:
> 2012/2/1 emijrp
>
>> ... and I'm thinking about an analysis of male-female biographies ratio
>> between Wikipedias.
>>
>
> After an analysis of a sample of 364k biographies where ~44% of them where
> classified using he/she his/her word occurences,
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 7:38 PM, emijrp wrote:
> 2012/2/1 emijrp
>>
>> ... and I'm thinking about an analysis of male-female biographies ratio
>> between Wikipedias.
>
>
> After an analysis of a sample of 364k biographies where ~44% of them where
> classified using he/she his/her word occurences,
2012/2/1 emijrp
> ... and I'm thinking about an analysis of male-female biographies ratio
> between Wikipedias.
>
After an analysis of a sample of 364k biographies where ~44% of them where
classified using he/she his/her word occurences, it shows only 6.2% of
female biographies on English Wikipe
On 2/2/2012 3:03 AM, Caroline Becker wrote:
Don't be depress Sarah if female participation remains low. Even if
Wikipedia was a perfect place without any bias, it would still be a
project from the "real world" were lot of forces prevent women from
editing : lower confidence in themselves, less
Here is the accumulate by project family
http://toolserver.org/~emijrp/wmcharts/wmchart0013.html Wikiquote,
Wikisource and Wikiversity are the winners.
2012/2/2 John Vandenberg
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 11:05 AM, emijrp wrote:
> > 2012/2/2 Sarah Stierch
> >>...
> >> What else are people seeing
Thanks Sarah!
Nina
Sendt fra min iPhone
Den 2. feb. 2012 kl. 22:15 skrev Sarah :
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:05 PM, emijrp wrote:
>> By the way, you can't invite 1000 women that a day after leave because they
>> don't understand how to edit (usability) or other reason. First, you have to
>> und
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:05 PM, emijrp wrote:
> By the way, you can't invite 1000 women that a day after leave because they
> don't understand how to edit (usability) or other reason. First, you have to
> understand why women leave. When you solves that, every woman that arrives,
> will continue e
Don't be depress Sarah if female participation remains low. Even if
Wikipedia was a perfect place without any bias, it would still be a project
from the "real world" were lot of forces prevent women from editing : lower
confidence in themselves, less free time, lower access to education.
We can't
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 11:05 AM, emijrp wrote:
> 2012/2/2 Sarah Stierch
>>...
>> What else are people seeing in their chosen languages that might be
>> interesting? Anything surprising?
>>
>
> No. Only a few examples where women are 15-25% of edits some days but in
> small Wikipedias or sister pr
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 8:59 AM, emijrp wrote:
> Hi all;
>
> Is there any up-to-date statistical tools monitoring gender gap? I have
> started this basic one[1], and I'm thinking about an analysis of male-female
> biographies ratio between Wikipedias.
>
> Suggestions and links to tools are welcome.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:59 PM, emijrp wrote:
> Hi all;
>
> Is there any up-to-date statistical tools monitoring gender gap? I have
> started this basic one[1], and I'm thinking about an analysis of male-female
> biographies ratio between Wikipedias.
>
> Suggestions and links to tools are welcome.
2012/2/2 Sarah Stierch
> On 2/1/12 5:39 PM, Sarah wrote:
>
>
> That's very interesting, thank you (and somewhat depressing).
>
> Sarah
>
> ___
>
>
>
> Yeah, it just shows that we need to take action.
>
We need to take action if a low number of women m
On 2/1/12 5:39 PM, Sarah wrote:
That's very interesting, thank you (and somewhat depressing).
Sarah
___
Yeah, it just shows that we need to take action. Imagine if every
Wikimedia contributor on this list, took a few hours and invited a
friend,
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 6:59 PM, emijrp wrote:
> Hi all;
>
> Is there any up-to-date statistical tools monitoring gender gap? I have
> started this basic one[1], and I'm thinking about an analysis of male-female
> biographies ratio between Wikipedias.
>
> Suggestions and links to tools are welcome.
Hi all;
Is there any up-to-date statistical tools monitoring gender gap? I have
started this basic one[1], and I'm thinking about an analysis of
male-female biographies ratio between Wikipedias.
Suggestions and links to tools are welcome.
Regards,
emijrp
[1] http://toolserver.org/~emijrp/wmchar
19 matches
Mail list logo
